Sec. 32.0291. PREPAYMENT REVIEWS AND PAYMENT HOLDS. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, the commission may:
(1) perform a prepayment review of a claim for reimbursement under the medical assistance program to determine whether the claim involves fraud or abuse; and
(2) as necessary to perform that review, withhold payment of the claim for not more than five working days without notice to the person submitting the claim.
(b) Subject to Sections 544.0104 and 544.0105 and Subchapter G, Chapter 544, Government Code, and notwithstanding any other law, the commission may impose a payment hold on future claims submitted by a provider.
(c) A payment hold authorized by this section is governed by the requirements and procedures specified for a payment hold under Sections 544.0104 and 544.0105 and Subchapter G, Chapter 544, Government Code, including the notice requirements under Section 544.0302.
(d) Repealed by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 622, Sec. 6, eff. September 1, 2013.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 198, Sec. 2.103, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 622 (S.B. 1803), Sec. 4, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 622 (S.B. 1803), Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 622 (S.B. 1803), Sec. 6, eff. September 1, 2013.
Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 219), Sec. 4.101, eff. April 2, 2015.
Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., Ch. 769 (H.B. 4611), Sec. 2.81, eff. April 1, 2025.
Notes of Decisions
Janek v. Harlingen Fam. Dentistry, P.C., 451 S.W.3d 97 (Tex. App. 2014).
· cites it 3× “Tex. Hum. Res.Code § 32.0291(b). In a SOAH hearing on a payment hold, HHSC must make a prima facie showing that the evidence relied on in imposing the hold is relevant, credible, and material to the issue of fraud or willful misrepresentation.”
Harlingen Fam. Dentistry, P.C. v. Texas Health & Human Servs. Comm'n, 452 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. App. 2014).
“Laws 611 , 690 (emphasis added) (amended 2013) (current version at Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 32.0291(b)). The plain language of these statutes authorized HHSC to impose a payment hold if it had “reliable evidence that the provider has committed fraud or wilful misrepresentation” and…”
— Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 32.0291(a)(1) — 1 case
— Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 32.0291(b) — 6 cases
Harlingen Fam. Dentistry, P.C. v. Texas Health & Human Servs. Comm'n, 452 S.W.3d 479 (Tex. App. 2014).
“Laws 611 , 690 (emphasis added) (amended 2013) (current version at Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 32.0291(b)). The plain language of these statutes authorized HHSC to impose a payment hold if it had “reliable evidence that the provider has committed fraud or wilful misrepresentation” and…”
Janek v. Harlingen Fam. Dentistry, P.C., 451 S.W.3d 97 (Tex. App. 2014).
“Tex. Hum. Res.Code § 32.0291(b). In a SOAH hearing on a payment hold, HHSC must make a prima facie showing that the evidence relied on in imposing the hold is relevant, credible, and material to the issue of fraud or willful misrepresentation.”
— Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 32.0291(c) — 4 cases
Janek v. Harlingen Fam. Dentistry, P.C., 451 S.W.3d 97 (Tex. App. 2014).
“Tex. Hum. Res.Code § 32.0291(b). In a SOAH hearing on a payment hold, HHSC must make a prima facie showing that the evidence relied on in imposing the hold is relevant, credible, and material to the issue of fraud or willful misrepresentation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.