Texas Codes

Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154 (2026)

Prior Notice Of Action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 541.154. PRIOR NOTICE OF ACTION. (a) A person seeking damages in an action against another person under this subchapter must provide written notice to the other person not later than the 61st day before the date the action is filed.

(b) The notice must advise the other person of:

(1) the specific complaint; and

(2) the amount of actual damages and expenses, including attorney's fees reasonably incurred in asserting the claim against the other person.

(c) The notice is not required if giving notice is impracticable because the action:

(1) must be filed to prevent the statute of limitations from expiring; or

(2) is asserted as a counterclaim.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1274, Sec. 2, eff. April 1, 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 94 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Joseph Hayes, Jr & Joanne Hayes, 507 S.W.3d 263 (Tex. App. 2016).
United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Joseph Hayes, Jr & Joanne Hayes, 507 S.W.3d 263 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “” See Tex. Ins. Code Ann. § 541.154 (a) (Vernon 2009); see also Tex.”
In Re Cypress Texas Lloyds, 437 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “” Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 541.154(a) (West 2009).”
Dosekun v. State Farm Lloyds, 833 F. Supp. 2d 662 (S.D. Tex. 2011). · cites it 5× “” Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154. The defendant asked this court to abate the suit until the 61st day after the plaintiffs provided the statutory written notice of their claims under the statute.”
Encompass Off. Solutions, Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc., 775 F. Supp. 2d 938 (E.D. Tex. 2011). “See Tex. Ins.Code § 541.154(a); Tex. Bus. & Com.”
Peacock v. AARP, Inc., 181 F. Supp. 3d 430 (S.D. Tex. 2016). “061; Texas Ins. Code § 541.151; Texas Ins. Code § 541.”
Kennard v. Indianapolis Life Ins., 420 F. Supp. 2d 601 (N.D. Tex. 2006). “505(b); Tex. Ins.Code § 541.154(c)(1). Kennard admits that he did not give notice before filing suit, but argues that the statute of limitations exception applies.”
In re Acceptance Indem. Ins. Co., 562 S.W.3d 645 (Tex. App. 2018). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
In re Acceptance Indem. Ins. Co., 562 S.W.3d 655 (Tex. App. 2018). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, & Nathan Burris (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 6× “154 provides that the “prior notice of action” must advise the other person of “the specific complaint” and “the amount of actual damages and expenses, including attorney’s fees reasonably incurred in asserting the claim against the other person.”
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 5× “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
Casas v. Travelers Pers. Ins. Co. (S.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 2× “16 TEX. INS. CODE § 541.154(a); see also TEX.”
— Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154(a) — 18 cases
United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. Joseph Hayes, Jr & Joanne Hayes, 507 S.W.3d 263 (Tex. App. 2016). “” See Tex. Ins. Code Ann. § 541.154 (a) (Vernon 2009); see also Tex.”
In Re Cypress Texas Lloyds, 437 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App. 2011). “” Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 541.154(a) (West 2009).”
Encompass Off. Solutions, Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc., 775 F. Supp. 2d 938 (E.D. Tex. 2011). “See Tex. Ins.Code § 541.154(a); Tex. Bus. & Com.”
In re Acceptance Indem. Ins. Co., 562 S.W.3d 645 (Tex. App. 2018). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
In re Acceptance Indem. Ins. Co., 562 S.W.3d 655 (Tex. App. 2018). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
— Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154(b) — 2 cases
Dosekun v. State Farm Lloyds, 833 F. Supp. 2d 662 (S.D. Tex. 2011). “” Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154. The defendant asked this court to abate the suit until the 61st day after the plaintiffs provided the statutory written notice of their claims under the statute.”
— Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154(b)(1) — 5 cases
In Re Cypress Texas Lloyds, 437 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App. 2011). “” Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 541.154(a) (West 2009).”
Dosekun v. State Farm Lloyds, 833 F. Supp. 2d 662 (S.D. Tex. 2011). “” Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154. The defendant asked this court to abate the suit until the 61st day after the plaintiffs provided the statutory written notice of their claims under the statute.”
in Re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freyman, & Nathan Burris (Tex. App. 2014). “154 provides that the “prior notice of action” must advise the other person of “the specific complaint” and “the amount of actual damages and expenses, including attorney’s fees reasonably incurred in asserting the claim against the other person.”
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds (Tex. App. 2011). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds (Tex. App. 2011). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
— Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154(c) — 9 cases
In Re Cypress Texas Lloyds, 437 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. App. 2011). “” Tex. Ins.Code Ann. § 541.154(a) (West 2009).”
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds (Tex. App. 2011). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
in Re: Cypress Texas Lloyds (Tex. App. 2011). “See TEX. INS. CODE ANN. § 541.154(a) (West 2009); TEX.”
Casas v. Travelers Pers. Ins. Co. (S.D. Tex. 2022). “16 TEX. INS. CODE § 541.154(a); see also TEX.”
— Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154(c)(1) — 2 cases
Kennard v. Indianapolis Life Ins., 420 F. Supp. 2d 601 (N.D. Tex. 2006). “505(b); Tex. Ins.Code § 541.154(c)(1). Kennard admits that he did not give notice before filing suit, but argues that the statute of limitations exception applies.”
Dosekun v. State Farm Lloyds, 833 F. Supp. 2d 662 (S.D. Tex. 2011). “” Tex. Ins. Code § 541.154. The defendant asked this court to abate the suit until the 61st day after the plaintiffs provided the statutory written notice of their claims under the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.