Texas Codes

Tex. Lab. Code § 413.0111 (2026)

Processing Agents

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 413.0111. PROCESSING AGENTS. The rules adopted by the commissioner for the reimbursement of prescription medications and services must authorize pharmacies to use agents or assignees to process claims and act on the behalf of the pharmacies under terms and conditions agreed on by the pharmacies.

Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 265 (H.B. 7), Sec. 3.234, eff. September 1, 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Apollo Enter., Inc. v. Scripnet, Inc., 301 S.W.3d 848 (Tex. App. 2009).
Apollo Enter., Inc. v. Scripnet, Inc., 301 S.W.3d 848 (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “1, 2005) (current version at Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 413.0111 (West 2006)) (requiring that Division’s rules for reimbursement of prescription medication and services “must authorize pharmacies to use agents or assignees to process claims and act on the behalf of the pharmacies…”
Apollo Enter., Inc. & WorkingRx, Inc. v. ScripNet, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “” 8 at Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 413.0111 (West 2006)) (requiring that Division’s rules for reimbursement of prescription medication and services “must authorize pharmacies to use agents or assignees to process claims and act on the behalf of the pharmacies under terms and…”
Apollo Enter., Inc. & WorkingRx, Inc. v. ScripNet, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “1, 2005) (current version at Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 413.0111 (West 2006)) (requiring that Division's rules for reimbursement of prescription medication and services "must authorize pharmacies to use agents or assignees to process claims and act on the behalf of the pharmacies…”
Texas Mut. Ins. Co. v. Apollo Enter., Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “Laws 469, 549 (codified at Tex. Lab. Code § 413.0111). Accordingly, 6 not reach the assignability issue, however, because we conclude that rule 133.”
Texas Mut. Ins. Co. v. Apollo Enter., Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “Laws 469, 549 (codified at Tex. Lab. Code § 413.0111). Accordingly, Apollo's argument is relevant only to the time period at issue in this appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.