Tex. Codes
» Local Government Code · TITLE 8. ACQUISITION, SALE, OR LEASE OF PROPERTY · SUBTITLE C. ACQUISITION, SALE, OR LEASE PROVISIONS APPLYING TO MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT · CHAPTER 271. PURCHASING AND CONTRACTING AUTHORITY OF MUNICIPALITIES, COUNTIES, AND CERTAIN OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Sec. 271.152. WAIVER OF IMMUNITY TO SUIT FOR CERTAIN CLAIMS. A local governmental entity that is authorized by statute or the constitution to enter into a contract and that enters into a contract subject to this subchapter waives sovereign immunity to suit for the purpose of adjudicating a claim for breach of the contract, subject to the terms and conditions of this subchapter.
Added by Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 604 (H.B. 2039), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.
Notes of Decisions
dallas/fort Worth Int'l Airport Bd. v. Vizant Tech., Llc, 576 S.W.3d 362 (Tex. 2019).
“TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE § 271.152. A "contract subject to this subchapter" is "a written contract stating the essential terms of the agreement for providing goods or services to the local governmental entity that is properly executed on behalf of the local governmental entity.”
City of Corinth v. Nurock Dev., Inc., 293 S.W.3d 360 (Tex. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “[1] The waiver of immunity for a claim under chapter 271 applies retroactively to contracts executed before the effective date of the statute, September 1, 2005, if sovereign immunity had not been waived with respect to the claim before that date.”
City of Carrollton v. Singer, 232 S.W.3d 790 (Tex. App. 2007).
“[4] See TEX. LOC. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 271.152 (waiving local governmental entity's sovereign immunity from suit for breach of "contract subject to this subchapter"), § 271.”
Clear Lake City Water Auth. v. Friendswood Dev. Co., Ltd., 256 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. App. 2008).
“” Tex. Loc. Gov't Code § 271.152. Under this statutory regime, once the prerequisites for waiver of immunity are shown to be satisfied, all claims for breach of the contract in question are subject to the Legislature’s waiver of immunity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.