Tex. Codes » Natural Resources Code · TITLE 3. OIL AND GAS · SUBTITLE C. POOLING AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS · CHAPTER 102. POOLING
Texas Codes

Tex. Nat. Res. Code § 102.111 (2026)

Right To Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 102.111. RIGHT TO APPEAL. A person affected by an order of the commission adopted under the authority of this chapter is entitled to judicial review of that order in a manner other than by trial de novo.

Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 2574, ch. 871, art. I, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1977.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: Helton v. R.R. Com'n of Texas, 126 S.W.3d 111 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Helton v. R.R. Com'n of Texas, 126 S.W.3d 111 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Nat. Res.Code ANN. § 102.111, § 102.”
R.R. COM'N v. Pend Oreille Oil & Gas Co., Inc., 817 S.W.2d 36 (Tex. 1991). · cites it 2× “" Tex. Nat.Res.Code § 102.111. B. Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act (APTRA) [5] Section 19 of the APTRA sets the standards for judicial review of agency actions, including those of the Railroad Commission.”
Buttes Resources Co. v. R.R. Comm'n, 732 S.W.2d 675 (Tex. App. 1987). “Tex.Nat.Res. Code Ann. § 102.111 (Vernon 1978); Tex.”
HR Martin Cnty. Landfill, LLC; & the R.R. Comm'n of Texas v. John W. Mabee; Joseph Guy Mabee; J. E.; L. E. Mabee Found., Inc.; Edward Frank Kelton; Betty Ann Kelton Howell; Jeffrey M. Johnston; & Sandra K. Johnston, No. 01-23-00036-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 31, 2024). · cites it 2× “Standard of review. We review the Commission’s decision in a contested case under the substantial evidence standard of review codified in the APA.”
Ammonite Oil & Gas Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas, No. 04-20-00465-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Oct. 27, 2021). “1 See TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. § 102.111 (providing for judicial review of the Commission’s final order in a manner other than trial de novo); id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.