Texas Codes
Tex. Prop. Code § 25.001 (2026)
Jurisdiction
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 25.001. JURISDICTION. A trial of the right of property is an action that applies only to personal property. A trial of the right of property must be tried in a court with jurisdiction of the amount in controversy.
Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3516, ch. 576, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, 150 S.W.3d 617 (Tex. App. 2004).
Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Luth, 150 S.W.3d 617 (Tex. App. 2004). “The petition in this case reflects that Luth and FBH filed suit against Hageman under claims of trial of right of property, conversion, and the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act (UDJA).”
Jorge A. Segoviano v. Maria D. Guerra, 557 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. App. 2017). “See TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. § 25.001 (West 2014); see Vela v.”
Grocers Supply Co. v. Powell, 775 S.W.2d 76 (Tex. App. 1989). “00, that in this case the value of the property seized by the Constable is the amount in controversy, and that respondent’s refusal to exercise jurisdiction is a violation of his duty and, therefore, subject to mandamus.”
Robert Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Thomas Luth & Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P./Robert Hageman (Tex. App. 2004). “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. §§ 25.001 -.002 (West 2000); Tex.”
Robert Hageman/Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P. v. Thomas Luth & Fritz, Byrne, Head & Harrison, L.L.P./Robert Hageman (Tex. App. 2004). “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. §§ 25.001 -.002 (West 2000); Tex.”
James Eric Melton & Kimberly Ann Melton v. Ed Smith (Tex. App. 2018). “TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 25.001 (West 2014).”
Michael Mount v. Carl Rodriguez (Tex. App. 2024). “3d at 614 ; see also TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 25.001 (“A trial of the right of property is an action that applies only to personal property.”
Hector Hugo Vela v. Tomas Gomez (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 25.001 (Vernon 2000).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.