Tex. Codes » Transportation Code · TITLE 7. VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC · SUBTITLE B. DRIVER'S LICENSES AND PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION CARDS · CHAPTER 524. ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION OF DRIVER'S LICENSE FOR FAILURE TO PASS TEST FOR INTOXICATION
Texas Codes

Tex. Transp. Code § 524.002 (2026)

Rules; Application Of Administrative Procedure Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 524.002. RULES; APPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. (a) The department and the State Office of Administrative Hearings shall adopt rules to administer this chapter.

(b) Chapter 2001, Government Code, applies to a proceeding under this chapter to the extent consistent with this chapter.

(c) The State Office of Administrative Hearings may adopt a rule that conflicts with Chapter 2001, Government Code, if a conflict is necessary to expedite the hearings process within the time required by this chapter and applicable federal funding guidelines.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

SUBCHAPTER B. SUSPENSION DETERMINATION AND NOTICE


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Alford, 154 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Alford, 154 S.W.3d 133 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. §§ 524.002 (a), 724.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Barlow, 48 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. 2001). · cites it 2× “The Department sought to appeal the county court at law's decision, but the court of appeals dismissed the appeal, holding that (1) it did not have general jurisdiction because the record contained no evidence that the case met the minimum amount in controversy requirement the…”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Caruana, 363 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2012). · cites it 2× “211); see also TEX. TRANSP. CODE §§ 524.002, 724.003 (granting SOAH rulemaking authority over license suspension hearings).”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Story, 115 S.W.3d 588 (Tex. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 524.002 (b) (Vernon 1999).”
Ex Parte Serna, 957 S.W.2d 598 (Tex. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 524.002 (Vernon 1997); TEX.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Lavender, 935 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. App. 1997). · cites it 3× “Laws 1025, 1870-71 (current version at TexTransp.Code Ann. § 524.002 (Vernon Pamph.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Allocca, 301 S.W.3d 364 (Tex. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 524.002 (b) (West 2007), § 724.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Watson, 945 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “1997); Tex.TRANsp.Code Ann. § 524.002(b) (Vernon Pamph.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Caruana, 363 S.W.3d 606 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 524.002 (b) (West 2007), § 724.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Valdez, 956 S.W.2d 767 (Tex. App. 1997). “; see also Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 524.002 (a)-(b) (Vernon Pamp.”
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Mendoza, 956 S.W.2d 808 (Tex. App. 1997). “See Tex. TRANSp. Code Ann. §§ 524.002 and 724.”
Martin v. Dep't of Pub. Saf., 964 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. App. 1998). “Martin appeals that judgment, raising the same two issues she argued before the trial court.”
Show all 44 citing cases →
Tex. Transp. Code § 524.002(a): 1 case
Tex. Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Gonzalez, 555 S.W.3d 714 (Tex. App. 2018).
Tex. Transp. Code § 524.002(b): 5 cases
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Watson, 945 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. App. 1997). “1997); Tex.TRANsp.Code Ann. § 524.002(b) (Vernon Pamph.”
Tex. Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Gonzalez, 555 S.W.3d 714 (Tex. App. 2018).
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Callender, 14 S.W.3d 319 (Tex. App. 2000).
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Harris, 33 S.W.3d 406 (Tex. App. 2000).
Texas Dep't of Pub. Saf. v. Armando Cardenas (Tex. App. 2015).
Tex. Transp. Code § 524.002(c): 1 case
Ex Parte Serna, 957 S.W.2d 598 (Tex. App. 1997). “See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 524.002 (Vernon 1997); TEX.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.