Texas Codes

Tex. Transp. Code § 541.102 (2026)

Restricted Districts

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 541.102. RESTRICTED DISTRICTS. In this subtitle:

(1) "Business district" means the territory adjacent to and including a highway if buildings used for business or industrial purposes, including a building used as a hotel, bank, office building, public building, or railroad station:

(A) are located within a 600-foot segment along the highway; and

(B) within that segment the buildings occupy at least 300 feet of frontage:

(i) on one side of the highway; or

(ii) collectively on both sides of the highway.

(2) "Residence district" means the territory, other than a business district, adjacent to and including a highway, if at least 300 feet of the highway frontage is primarily improved with:

(A) residences; or

(B) buildings used for business purposes and residences.

(3) "Urban district" means the territory adjacent to and including a highway, if the territory:

(A) is not in a municipality; and

(B) is improved with structures that are used for business, industry, or dwelling houses and located at intervals of less than 100 feet for a distance of at least one-quarter mile on either side of the highway.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

SUBCHAPTER C. VEHICLES, RAIL TRANSPORTATION, AND EQUIPMENT

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2004–2015 · leading case: Joubert v. State, 129 S.W.3d 686 (Tex. App. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Joubert v. State, 129 S.W.3d 686 (Tex. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “[1] See Tex. Trans. Code Ann. § 541.102 (1) (Vernon 1999).”

United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Rankin, 468 S.W.3d 609 (Tex. App. 2015). “Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 541.102 (3) (West 2011) (emphasis added).”

United Parcel Serv., Inc. & Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually & as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, & Samuel Rankin, Minors (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “13 TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 541.102(2) ..........”

United Parcel Serv., Inc. & Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually & as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, & Samuel Rankin, Minors (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “” TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 541.102(2) (West 2011) (emphasis added).”

United Parcel Serv., Inc. & Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually & as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, & Samuel Rankin, Minors (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “23 TEX. TRANSP. CODE § 541.102. . . . . . . .”

— Tex. Transp. Code § 541.102(1) — 1 case

Joubert v. State, 129 S.W.3d 686 (Tex. App. 2004). “[1] See Tex. Trans. Code Ann. § 541.102 (1) (Vernon 1999).”

— Tex. Transp. Code § 541.102(2) — 2 cases

United Parcel Serv., Inc. & Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually & as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, & Samuel Rankin, Minors (Tex. App. 2015). “” TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 541.102(2) (West 2011) (emphasis added).”

— Tex. Transp. Code § 541.102(3) — 2 cases

United Parcel Serv., Inc. & Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually & as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, & Samuel Rankin, Minors (Tex. App. 2015). “” TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 541.102(2) (West 2011) (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.