Sec. 112.001. TAXPAYERS' SUITS: JURISDICTION. The district courts of Travis County have exclusive, original jurisdiction of a taxpayer suit brought under this chapter. This section prevails over a provision of Chapter 25, Government Code, to the extent of any conflict.
Acts 1981, 67th Leg., p. 1512, ch. 389, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1982. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 232, Sec. 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1989.
Notes of Decisions
In re Allcat Claims Serv., L.P. & John Weakly, 356 S.W.3d 455 (Tex. 2011).
· cites it 7× “051 (requiring that a person must pay the tax in question before bringing a suit “contend[ing] that the tax or fee is unlawful or that the public official charged with the duty of collecting the tax or fee may not legally demand or collect the tax or fee”); id.”
U.S. Concrete, Inc. v. Glenn Hegar, 578 S.W.3d 559 (Tex. App.—Austin 2019).
“221 (governing suits by persons owing taxes or fees); Tex. Tax Code §§ 112.001–.156 (governing taxpayers’ suits).”
Texley Inc. v. Glenn Hegar, 613 S.W.3d 322 (Tex. App.—Austin 2020).
· cites it 3× “” (citing Tex. Tax Code §§ 112.001, .051, .101)), but instead filed an oath of inability to pay taxes or post bond, see id.”
Glenn Hegar v. CHZP, LLC, No. 03-17-00214-CV (Tex. App.—Austin June 28, 2018).
“See, respectively, Tex. Tax Code §§ 112.001–.156; Tex. Gov’t Code §§ 2001.”
Manana Ent., Inc. v. Glenn Hegar, No. 03-19-00753-CV (Tex. App.—Austin June 24, 2021).
“(citing Tex. Tax Code §§ 112.001, .051, .101). Relevant here, a taxpayer seeking to initiate a protest suit must first “pay the amount claimed by the state” and submit a written protest that states “fully and in detail each reason for recovering the payment.”
S.C. v. M.B., 650 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. 2022).
“02 § 1 (“[T]he trial court presiding over the case in which the person was acquitted, if the trial court is a district court, a justice court, or a municipal court of record, or a district court in the county in which the trial court is located shall enter an order of expunction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.