U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle E— Reserve Components › Part PART I— ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION › Chapter CHAPTER 1005— ELEMENTS OF RESERVE COMPONENTS

10 U.S.C. § 10143

Ready Reserve: Selected Reserve

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Within the Ready Reserve of each of the reserve components there is a Selected Reserve. The Selected Reserve consists of units, and, as designated by the Secretary concerned, of Reserves, trained as prescribed in section 10147(a)(1) of this title or section 502(a) of title 32, as appropriate.(b) The organization and unit structure of the Selected Reserve shall be approved—(1) in the case of all reserve components other than the Coast Guard Reserve, by the Secretary of Defense based upon recommendations from the military departments as approved by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in accordance with contingency and war plans; and(2) in the case of the Coast Guard Reserve, by the Secretary of Homeland Security upon the recommendation of the Commandant of the Coast Guard.(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title XVI, § 1661(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2972; amended Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, § 1704(b)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 268(b), (c) of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, § 1661(a)(2)(A).

Amendments

2002—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted “of Homeland Security” for “of Transportation”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 1, 1994, except as otherwise provided, see section 1691 of Pub. L. 103–337, set out as a note under section 10001 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: Us Ex Rel. Conover v. Anthony, 781 F. Supp. 2d 257 (D. Maryland 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Us Ex Rel. Conover v. Anthony, 781 F. Supp. 2d 257 (D. Maryland 2011). “” 10 U.S.C. § 10143 (a). 13 . In light of this holding, I need not address the defendants' other arguments in support of dismissal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.