10 U.S.C. § 1071
Purpose of this chapter
The purpose of this chapter is to create and maintain high morale in the uniformed services by providing an improved and uniform program of medical and dental care for members and certain former members of those services, and for their dependents.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 65
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973).
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973). “, and 10 U. S. C. § 1071 et seq., a scheme for the provision of fringe benefits to members of the uniformed services on a competitive basis with business and industry.”
Maureen M. Britell v. United States, 372 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “of [the uniformed] services, and their dependents,” 10 U.S.C. § 1071 (2000), CHAMPUS funds all “medically necessary services and supplies associated with maternity care.”
Cnty. Bd. of Arlington Co. v. Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc., 996 F.3d 243 (4th Cir. 2021). “, 10 U.S.C. § 1071 (providing for “an improved and uniform program of medical and dental care for members and certain former members of [the armed] services, and for their dependents”); 32 C.”
Mogretta McGee v. Pete Funderburg, as Tr. for Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 665 Health & Welfare Fund, 17 F.3d 1122 (8th Cir. 1994). “As such, he was eligible for health care benefits under the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services, 10 U.S.C. § 1071 . (CHAMPUS). In denying coverage, the Fund contended that George McGee’s CHAMPUS coverage terminated his COBRA eligibility because he was…”
In Re \Agent Orange\" Prod. Liab. Litig.", 597 F. Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y 1984). “See 10 U.S.C. § 1071 , et seq. Surviving spouses are also entitled to CHAMPUS benefits except during a remarriage.”
Navab-Safavi v. Broad. Bd. of Governors, 650 F. Supp. 2d 40 (D.D.C. 2009). “1994) (APA precluded physician's Bivens action alleging that termination of his employment at military hospital violated due process, where employment relationship was governed by military health care program established pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1071 et seq.); Moore v. Glickman,…”
Ingham Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “” See 10 U.S.C. § 1071 (2012). 3 Although the program initially covered only active duty members and their dependents, coverage was later expanded to include retirees, eligible dependents of,retirees, and survivors, i.”
John G. Robb v. United States, 80 F.3d 884 (4th Cir. 1996). “The Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Service ("CHAMPUS”) was established by Congress pursuant to the Dependents' Medical Care Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1071 et seq., to provide medical and dental benefits to dependents of active-duty and former members of the military.”
In re \Agent Orange\" Prod. Liab. Litig.", 635 F.2d 987 (2d Cir. 1980). “” 10 U.S.C. § 1071 . Further, in Owens this court discerned in “the scheme of regulation of federal prisons [an indication of] congressional intent to provide some general protections for federal prisoners.”
Burts v. Burts, 266 P.3d 337 (Alaska 2011). “10 U.S.C. § 1071 (2006). . Hisquierdo, 439 U.”
Downey v. Dunnington, 895 N.E.2d 271 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “CHAMPUS is a subdivision of the Department of Defense, and it administers the Dependent’s Medical Care Act ( 10 U.S.C. §§1071 through 1106 (2000)), a federally subsidized health care program for dependents of active-duty and retired members of the United States armed forces.”
Green Hosp. v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 393 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “The complaint seeks judicial review of a final agency decision denying plaintiff Green Hospital (Hospital) reimbursement for hospital services rendered to a beneficiary of the Civilian Health and Medical Program for the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS), 10 U.S.C. § 1071 et seq 1…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.