10 U.S.C. § 1183

Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, § 503(a), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2003]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2003 · leading case: Kindred v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 106 (Fed. Cl. 1998).
Kindred v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 106 (Fed. Cl. 1998). · cites it 2× “Under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 1183 , a BOR “review[s] the reports of [the] Board of Inquiry .”
Hoffman v. United States, 57 Fed. Cl. 253 (Fed. Cl. 2003). · cites it 3× “See 10 U.S.C. § 1183 , “Boards of review,” repealed in Pub.”
Marin v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 129 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1183 , if a BOI determines that an officer has failed to show cause for retention on active duty, a board of review then looks at the case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.