Notes of Decisions
In re the Marriage of Priessman, 266 P.3d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 10× “[chapter] 11,” rather, “[h]e ha[d] been awarded [CRSC] benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1413a.” The court therefore concluded that § 25-530 did not apply.”
Adams v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
· cites it 15× “§ 1201 ; 10 U.S.C. § 1413a; Military Retirement Pay; Combat-Related Special Compensation.”
Martin v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
· cites it 19× “Codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, it provides that an eligible retiree is a member of the uniformed services who 1) is entitled to retired pay; and 2) has a combat-related disability.”
Maine Cmty. Health Options v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1308 (2020).
· cites it 2× “…specific fund from which the Government shall pay. See, e.g., 5 U. S. C. §§8102a, 8134, 8461; 7 U. S. C. §§26 , 6523; 10 U. S. C. §1413a; 16 U. S. C. §§450e–1, 460kk; 19 U. S. C. §2296 ; 20 U. S. C. §§1070g–1, 1078, 3988, 5607; 22 U. S. C. §3681 ; 30 U. S. C. §1240a; 31 U. S.…”
Soto v. United States, 605 U.S. 360 (2025).
· cites it 6× “10 U. S. C. §1413a. We hold that it does, and thus that the settlement procedures and limitations established under the Barring Act do not apply to claims for CRSC payments.”
Sharp v. Sharp, 314 S.W.3d 22 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2010).
· cites it 6× “See 10 U.S.C. § 1413a. Under this statute, veterans, such as Tracy, may receive Combat-Related Special Compensation ("CRSC") in lieu of full retirement pay and Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay.”
Porter v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 552 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
· cites it 4× “Likewise, 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, which provides that “[t]he Secretary concerned shall pay to each eligible combat-related disabled uniformed services retiree who elects benefits under this section a monthly amount for the combat-related disability of the retiree,” is money-mandating.”
Soto v. United States, 92 F.4th 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
· cites it 5× “10 U.S.C. § 1413a (the CRSC statute). Before January 1, 2008, CRSC was only available to veterans who had completed at least twenty years of mili- tary service.”
Marriage of Chapman, 3 Cal. App. 5th 719 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “(10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b); 26 U.S.C. § 104 (a)(4), (b)(2)(C).”
Cook v. Cook, 983 N.W.2d 180 (S.D. 2022).
· cites it 2× “10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c)(1)–(2). CRSC is not retired pay under federal law.”
Merrill v. Merrill, 284 P.3d 880 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “See 10 U.S.C. § 1413a (2006 & Supp. 2008); see also 26 U.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(a): 10 cases
Soto v. United States, 605 U.S. 360 (2025).
“10 U. S. C. §1413a. We hold that it does, and thus that the settlement procedures and limitations established under the Barring Act do not apply to claims for CRSC payments.”
In re the Marriage of Priessman, 266 P.3d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
“[chapter] 11,” rather, “[h]e ha[d] been awarded [CRSC] benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1413a.” The court therefore concluded that § 25-530 did not apply.”
Adams v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“§ 1201 ; 10 U.S.C. § 1413a; Military Retirement Pay; Combat-Related Special Compensation.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b): 3 cases
Marriage of Chapman, 3 Cal. App. 5th 719 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“(10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b); 26 U.S.C. § 104 (a)(4), (b)(2)(C).”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b)(1): 3 cases
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b)(2): 2 cases
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b)(3)(A): 1 case
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b)(3)(B): 4 cases
Porter v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 552 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“Likewise, 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, which provides that “[t]he Secretary concerned shall pay to each eligible combat-related disabled uniformed services retiree who elects benefits under this section a monthly amount for the combat-related disability of the retiree,” is money-mandating.”
Soto v. United States, 92 F.4th 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
“10 U.S.C. § 1413a (the CRSC statute). Before January 1, 2008, CRSC was only available to veterans who had completed at least twenty years of mili- tary service.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b)(l): 2 cases
In re the Marriage of Priessman, 266 P.3d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
“[chapter] 11,” rather, “[h]e ha[d] been awarded [CRSC] benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1413a.” The court therefore concluded that § 25-530 did not apply.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c): 8 cases
Sharp v. Sharp, 314 S.W.3d 22 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2010).
“See 10 U.S.C. § 1413a. Under this statute, veterans, such as Tracy, may receive Combat-Related Special Compensation ("CRSC") in lieu of full retirement pay and Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay.”
Soto v. United States, 92 F.4th 1094 (Fed. Cir. 2024).
“10 U.S.C. § 1413a (the CRSC statute). Before January 1, 2008, CRSC was only available to veterans who had completed at least twenty years of mili- tary service.”
Martin v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“Codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, it provides that an eligible retiree is a member of the uniformed services who 1) is entitled to retired pay; and 2) has a combat-related disability.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c)(1): 5 cases
Cook v. Cook, 983 N.W.2d 180 (S.D. 2022).
“10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c)(1)–(2). CRSC is not retired pay under federal law.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c)(2): 1 case
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c)(l): 2 cases
In re the Marriage of Priessman, 266 P.3d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
“[chapter] 11,” rather, “[h]e ha[d] been awarded [CRSC] benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1413a.” The court therefore concluded that § 25-530 did not apply.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(d): 5 cases
In re the Marriage of Priessman, 266 P.3d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
“[chapter] 11,” rather, “[h]e ha[d] been awarded [CRSC] benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1413a.” The court therefore concluded that § 25-530 did not apply.”
Soto v. United States, 605 U.S. 360 (2025).
“10 U. S. C. §1413a. We hold that it does, and thus that the settlement procedures and limitations established under the Barring Act do not apply to claims for CRSC payments.”
Martin v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“Codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, it provides that an eligible retiree is a member of the uniformed services who 1) is entitled to retired pay; and 2) has a combat-related disability.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(e): 8 cases
Adams v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“§ 1201 ; 10 U.S.C. § 1413a; Military Retirement Pay; Combat-Related Special Compensation.”
In re the Marriage of Priessman, 266 P.3d 362 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011).
“[chapter] 11,” rather, “[h]e ha[d] been awarded [CRSC] benefits pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1413a.” The court therefore concluded that § 25-530 did not apply.”
Merrill v. Merrill, 284 P.3d 880 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
“See 10 U.S.C. § 1413a (2006 & Supp. 2008); see also 26 U.”
Martin v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“Codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, it provides that an eligible retiree is a member of the uniformed services who 1) is entitled to retired pay; and 2) has a combat-related disability.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(e)(2): 5 cases
Adams v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“§ 1201 ; 10 U.S.C. § 1413a; Military Retirement Pay; Combat-Related Special Compensation.”
Martin v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“Codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, it provides that an eligible retiree is a member of the uniformed services who 1) is entitled to retired pay; and 2) has a combat-related disability.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(e)(2)(A): 1 case
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(e)(2)(B): 3 cases
Martin v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
“Codified at 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, it provides that an eligible retiree is a member of the uniformed services who 1) is entitled to retired pay; and 2) has a combat-related disability.”
Adams v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 645 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“§ 1201 ; 10 U.S.C. § 1413a; Military Retirement Pay; Combat-Related Special Compensation.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(g): 12 cases
Sharp v. Sharp, 314 S.W.3d 22 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2010).
“See 10 U.S.C. § 1413a. Under this statute, veterans, such as Tracy, may receive Combat-Related Special Compensation ("CRSC") in lieu of full retirement pay and Concurrent Retirement Disability Pay.”
Marriage of Chapman, 3 Cal. App. 5th 719 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
“(10 U.S.C. § 1413a(b); 26 U.S.C. § 104 (a)(4), (b)(2)(C).”
Cook v. Cook, 983 N.W.2d 180 (S.D. 2022).
“10 U.S.C. § 1413a(c)(1)–(2). CRSC is not retired pay under federal law.”
10 U.S.C. § 1413a(h): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.