10 U.S.C. § 2112
Establishment
2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: “There is hereby authorized to be established within 25 miles of the District of Columbia a Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the ‘University’), at a site or sites to be selected by the Secretary of Defense, with authority to grant appropriate advanced degrees. It shall be so organized as to graduate not less than 100 medical students annually.”
2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–107 struck out “, with the first class graduating not later than
1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–106 struck out “, upon recommendation of the Board of Regents,” before “institute actions necessary”.
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–513 inserted “in this chapter” after “hereinafter”, and substituted “
1979—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–107 inserted provisions respecting the maximum number of first-year enrollments in the University.
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective
Pub. L. 92–426, § 1,
For transfer of authority of Board of Regents of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences to Secretary of Defense, see section 8091 of Pub. L. 101–511, set out as a note under section 2113 of this title.
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title VII, § 716(a),
Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, § 1071,
Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, § 922,
[(a) Repealed. Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title IX, § 907(b)(1),
“(b)
“(c)
“(1) A comparison of the cost of obtaining physicians for the Armed Forces from the University with the cost of obtaining physicians from other sources.
“(2) An assessment of the retention rate needs of the Armed Forces for physicians in relation to the respective retention rates of physicians obtained from the University and physicians obtained from other sources and the factors that contribute to retention rates among military physicians obtained from all sources.
“(3) A review of the quality of the medical education provided at the University with the quality of medical education provided by other sources of military physicians.
“(4) A review of the overall issue of the special needs of military medicine and how those special needs are being met by physicians obtained from University and physicians obtained from other sources.
“(5) An assessment of the extent to which the University has responded to the 1990 report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, including recommendations as to resolution of any continuing issues relating to management and internal fiscal controls of the University, including issues relating to the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine identified in the 1990 report.
“(6) Such other recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.”
Pub. L. 98–94, title XII, § 1265,