10 U.S.C. § 2313
Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1881(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4293]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1967–2020 · leading case: Bowsher v. Merck & Co., 460 U.S. 824 (1983).
Bowsher v. Merck & Co., 460 U.S. 824 (1983). “As required by 10 U. S. C. § 2313 (b) and 65 Stat. 700 , 41 U.”
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Gen. of the United States, & United States, 574 F.2d 904 (7th Cir. 1978). “” This request was pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) and 41 U.S.C. § 254 (c).”
United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., the Shipbuilders Council of Am., Amicus Curiae, 862 F.2d 464 (4th Cir. 1988). “*466 On February 11, 1987, DCAA issued a subpoena duces tecum to NNS pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (d) demanding: Trial balance, adjusting entries, segment financial workpapers, consolidating entries, formal consolidated balance sheet and income statement, Federal income tax…”
Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA, 937 F.3d 164 (3rd Cir. 2019). “, 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (a), the FDA inspects meatpackers, 21 U.”
United States of Am. & Charles A. Bowsher, Comptroller Gen. of the United States of Am. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 751 F.2d 220 (8th Cir. 1984). “Consequently, according to MDC, the directive of 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) that the access clause be included in all contracts negotiated under 10 U.”
Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller, 665 F.2d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “The right of the Comptroller to examine records is based on 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) (1976) and 41 U.S.C.”
SmithKline Corp. v. Staats, 483 F. Supp. 712 (E.D. Pa. 1980). “The same clause was included in the Defense Supply Agency contracts, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b), which provides: (b) Except as provided in subsection (c), each contract negotiated under this chapter shall provide that the Comptroller General and his representatives are…”
Bristol Lab. Div. of Bristol-Myers Co. v. Staats, 428 F. Supp. 1388 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). “Pursuant to the provisions of 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) 2 all three *1389 contracts contain a so-called access to records clause, which in pertinent part provides: “[Bristol agrees] that the Comptroller General of the United States or any of his duly authorized representatives shall,…”
Smithkline Corp. v. Elmer Staats, Comptroller Gen. of the United States, & the United States of Am., 668 F.2d 201 (3rd Cir. 1981). “” See 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) (1976) (Defense Supply Agency); 41 U.”
United States v. Abbott Labs., a Corp., 597 F.2d 672 (7th Cir. 1979). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) and 41 U.S.C. § 254 (c).”
United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 837 F.2d 162 (4th Cir. 1988). “DCAA’s subpoena authority is set forth in 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (d)(1), which reads: The Director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency (or any agency) may require by subpoena the production of books, documents, papers or records of a contractor, access to which is provided by…”
Hewlett-Packard Co., a Corp., David Packard, & Wilfred F. Cavier v. United States, 385 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir. 1967). “HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: The United States brought this action against Hewlett-Packard Company, a corporation, to enforce the Government’s asserted right under 10 U.S.C. § 2313 (b) (1964) to examine certain books and records of the company.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2313(d)(1) — 1 case
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Reed, 655 F. Supp. 1408 (E.D. Va. 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.