10 U.S.C. § 2433a

Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1850(l), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4271]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Hamilton v. Lanning, 560 U.S. 505 (2010).
Hamilton v. Lanning, 560 U.S. 505 (2010). “§§ 1364 (a), (c)(2) (requiring the triennial immigration-impact report to include information “projected for the succeeding five-year period, based on reasonable estimates substantiated by the best available evidence”); 10 U. S. C. §2433a(a)(2)(B) (2006 ed., Supp.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2433a(a)(2)(B) — 1 case
Hamilton v. Lanning, 560 U.S. 505 (2010). “§§ 1364 (a), (c)(2) (requiring the triennial immigration-impact report to include information “projected for the succeeding five-year period, based on reasonable estimates substantiated by the best available evidence”); 10 U. S. C. §2433a(a)(2)(B) (2006 ed., Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.