U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle A— General Military Law › Part PART IV— SERVICE, SUPPLY, AND PROPERTY › Chapter [CHAPTER 148— REPEALED] › Subchapter [SUBCHAPTER V— REPEALED]

10 U.S.C. § 2533a

Renumbered § 4862]

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

[renumbered]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2020 · leading case: E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus., Inc., 637 F.3d 435 (4th Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus., Inc., 637 F.3d 435 (4th Cir. 2011). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2533a. However, the extent to which DuPont’s dominant market position can be attributed to the Berry Amendment — something the district court attempted to analyze by inappropriately going beyond the Counterclaim— cannot be determined at the motion-to-dismiss…”
Excel Mfg., Ltd. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 800 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 2× “at 11-12, 14 (citing 10 U.S.C. § 2533a (2006)). “The Berry Amendment generally restricts the Department of Defense’s expenditure of funds for certain articles (including ‘clothing’) to domestically produced products.”
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Indus., Inc., 683 F. Supp. 2d 401 (E.D. Va. 2009). “¶ 27 (noting that the only way around the Berry Amendment prohibition of foreign sales to Department of Defense purchasers is by congressional action, and observing that Teijin obtained such a waiver in 2001); 10 U.S.C. § 2533a (“[Absent a few exceptions], funds appropriated or…”
Hwi Gear, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2533a(a)-(b). 3 C. Offers The agency received offers from six bidders designated as small business concerns, including Mechanix and HWI.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2533a(a) — 1 case
Hwi Gear, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “See 10 U.S.C. § 2533a(a)-(b). 3 C. Offers The agency received offers from six bidders designated as small business concerns, including Mechanix and HWI.”
— 10 U.S.C. § 2533a(b) — 1 case
Excel Mfg., Ltd. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 800 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “at 11-12, 14 (citing 10 U.S.C. § 2533a (2006)). “The Berry Amendment generally restricts the Department of Defense’s expenditure of funds for certain articles (including ‘clothing’) to domestically produced products.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.