10 U.S.C. § 5533

Required testing of ground-based midcourse defense element of ballistic missile defense system

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Testing Required.—Except as provided in subsection (c), not less frequently than once each fiscal year, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall administer a flight test of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the ballistic missile defense system. Beginning not later than five years after the date on which the next generation interceptor achieves initial operational capability, the Director shall ensure that such flight tests include the next generation interceptor.(b)Requirements.—The Director shall ensure that each test carried out under subsection (a) provides for one or more of the following:(1) The validation of technical improvements made to increase system performance and reliability.(2) The evaluation of the operational effectiveness of the ground-based midcourse defense element of the ballistic missile defense system.(3) The use of threat-representative targets and critical engagement conditions, including the use of threat-representative countermeasures.(4) The evaluation of new configurations of interceptors before they are fielded.(5) The satisfaction of the “fly before buy” acquisition approach for new interceptor components or software.(6) The evaluation of the interoperability of the ground-based midcourse defense element with other elements of the ballistic missile defense systems.(c)Exceptions.—The Director may forgo a test under subsection (a) in a fiscal year under one or more of the following conditions:(1) Such a test would jeopardize national security.(2) Insufficient time considerations between post-test analysis and subsequent pre-test design.(3) Insufficient funding.(4) An interceptor is unavailable.(5) A target is unavailable or is insufficiently representative of threats.(6) The test range or necessary test assets are unavailable.(7) Inclement weather.(8) Any other condition the Director considers appropriate.(d)Certification.—Not later than 45 days after forgoing a test for a condition or conditions under subsection (c)(8), the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification setting forth the condition or conditions that caused the test to be forgone under such subsection.(e)Report.—Not later than 45 days after forgoing a test for any condition specified in subsection (c), the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the rationale for forgoing the test and a plan to restore an intercept flight test in the Integrated Master Test Plan of the Missile Defense Agency. In the case of a test forgone for a condition or conditions under subsection (c)(8), the report required by this subsection is in addition to the certification required by subsection (d).(Added Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1649(a), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2195.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 5533, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 318, provided for enlistment of minors in naval service, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 90–235, § 2(a)(3), (b), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 756.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XVI, § 1689, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2631, as amended by Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, § 902(97), title XVI, § 1684, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1555, 1783; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XVI, § 1668(d), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2107, which was set out in a note under section 4205 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1649(b)(6), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2199.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1969–1969 · leading case: United States v. Lenoir, 18 C.M.A. 387 (1969).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Lenoir, 18 C.M.A. 387 (1969). “10 USC § 5533 . “Minors (a) A male person at least 14 and under 18 years of age may be enlisted in the naval service if he has the consent of his parents or guardian.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.