10 U.S.C. § 614

Notice of convening of selection boards

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) At least 30 days before a selection board is convened under section 611(a) of this title to recommend officers in a grade for promotion to the next higher grade, the Secretary concerned (1) shall notify in writing the officers eligible for consideration for promotion of the date on which the board is to convene and the name and date of rank of the junior officer, and of the senior officer, in the promotion zone as of the date of the notification, or (2) shall issue a general written notice to the armed force concerned regarding the convening of the board which shall include the convening date of the board and the name and date of rank of the junior officer, and of the senior officer, in the promotion zone as of the date of the notification.(b) An officer eligible for consideration by a selection board convened under section 611(a) of this title may send a written communication to the board, to arrive not later than 10 calendar days before the date the board convenes, calling attention to any matter concerning himself that the officer considers important to his case. The selection board shall give consideration to any timely communication under this subsection.(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 105, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2852; amended Pub. L. 97–22, § 4(b), July 10, 1981, 95 Stat. 126; Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title V, § 504(a)(2)(A), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1357; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, § 505(a), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3227; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, § 501(a), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1373.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2017—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–91 substituted “10 calendar days before” for “the day before” in first sentence.

2006—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–163 inserted “the day before” after “not later than” in first sentence.

1991—Pub. L. 102–190 struck out “; communications with boards” after “selection boards” in section catchline.

1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–22 substituted “which shall include the convening date of the board” for “, the names of the officers eligible for consideration by the board as of the date of the notification, the convening date of the board,”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2017 Amendment

Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, § 501(c), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1373, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 14106 of this title] shall apply with respect to promotion selection boards convened on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 2017].”

Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, § 505(c), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3227, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 14106 of this title] shall take effect on March 1, 2006, and shall apply with respect to selection boards convened on or after that date.”

Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–190 applicable to selection boards convened under section 611(a) of this title after end of 60-day period beginning Dec. 5, 1991, see section 504(e) of Pub. L. 102–190, set out as a note under section 615 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to prescribe regulations under this section effective on Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: In Re: Navy Chaplaincy, 69 F. Supp. 3d 249 (D.D.C. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy, 69 F. Supp. 3d 249 (D.D.C. 2014). “” 10 U.S.C. § 614 (a). In furtherance of this mandate, board discussions, deliberations, notes, and records are statutorily immune from legal process and “may not be used for any purpose” in any judicial or administrative proceeding without the consent of the Secretary of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.