10 U.S.C. § 8037

Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) There are Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, detailed by the Secretary of the Navy from officers on the active-duty list of the Navy and officers on the active-duty list of the Marine Corps. The Secretary of the Navy shall prescribe the number of Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in accordance with section 8036(a) of this title.(b) The Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations shall perform such duties as the Secretary of the Navy prescribes.(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title V, § 512(b), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1051, § 5037; amended Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, § 502(b), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1875; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, § 902(b)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 273; renumbered § 8037 and amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §§ 807(a)(1), 809(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1834, 1840.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 5087 of this title prior to enactment of Pub. L. 99–433.

A prior section 8037 was renumbered section 9037 of this title.

Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232, § 807(a)(1), renumbered section 5037 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232, § 809(a), substituted “section 8036(a)” for “section 5036(a)”.

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–181 substituted “There are Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations,” for “There are in the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations not more than three Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations,” and inserted at end “The Secretary of the Navy shall prescribe the number of Assistant Chiefs of Naval Operations in accordance with section 5036(a) of this title.”

2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–375 struck out “in the line” before “of the Navy”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2008–2017 · leading case: United States v. Morita, 74 M.J. 116 (C.A.A.F. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Morita, 74 M.J. 116 (C.A.A.F. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 867 (a)(2) (2012), and 10 U.S.C. § 8037 (d)(3) (2012), is without merit.”

United States v. Shea, 76 M.J. 277 (C.A.A.F. 2017). “Additionally, it was well within the Judge Advocate General’s authority to assign Judge Hecker as the IMA to the JAJM of the APLOA 10 U.S.C. § 8037 (c)(2) (2012); Vines, 15 M.”

United States v. Morita (C.A.A.F. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 867 (a)(2) (2012), and 10 U.S.C. § 8037 (d)(3) (2012), is without merit.”

Promotions of Judge Advocates Gen. Under Section 543 of the Nat'l Def. Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (OLC 2008). “, 10 U.S.C. § 8037 (a) (2006) (Air Force TJAG) (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.