U.S. Code » Title 10 » Subtitle Subtitle A— General Military Law › Part PART II— PERSONNEL › Chapter CHAPTER 47— UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XI— MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

10 U.S.C. § 936

Art. 136. Authority to administer oaths

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The following persons on active duty or performing inactive-duty training may administer oaths for the purposes of military administration, including military justice:(1) All judge advocates.(2) All summary courts-martial.(3) All adjutants, assistant adjutants, acting adjutants, and personnel adjutants.(4) All commanding officers of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard.(5) All staff judge advocates and legal officers, and acting or assistant staff judge advocates and legal officers.(6) All other persons designated by regulations of the armed forces or by statute.(b) The following persons on active duty or performing inactive-duty training may administer oaths necessary in the performance of their duties:(1) The president, military judge, trial counsel, and assistant trial counsel for all general and special courts-martial.(2) The president and the counsel for the court of any court of inquiry.(3) All officers designated to take a deposition.(4) All persons detailed to conduct an investigation.(5) All recruiting officers.(6) All other persons designated by regulations of the armed forces or by statute.(c) Each judge and senior judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall have the powers relating to oaths, affirmations, and acknowledgments provided to justices and judges of the United States by section 459 of title 28.(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 77; Pub. L. 86–589, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 329; Pub. L. 90–179, § 1(7), Dec. 8, 1967, 81 Stat. 546; Pub. L. 90–632, § 2(34), Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1343; Pub. L. 98–209, § 2(f), Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1393; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, § 804(c), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3907; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, § 1234(a)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 551(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title V, § 542, Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 114; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title V, § 541(a), div. E, title LXI, § 5502, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2124, 2960.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

936(a)

936(b)

936(c)

50:732(a).

50:732(b).

50:732(c).

May 5, 1950, ch. 169, § 1 (Art. 136), 64 Stat. 143.

936(d)

50:732(d).

In subsection (a), the word “may” is substituted for the words “shall have authority to”. The word “shall” before the words “have the general powers” is omitted as surplusage. The words “the continental limits” are omitted, since section 101(1) of this title defines the United States to include the States and the District of Columbia.

In subsections (a) and (b), the words “in the armed forces” are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the word “may” is substituted for the words “shall have authority to”.

In subsection (c), the words “of any character” are omitted as surplusage. The word “may” is substituted for the word “shall”.

In subsection (d), the word “is” is substituted for the words “shall be”.

Editorial NotesAmendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–328, § 5502, struck out “and to act as notary” after “oaths” in section catchline.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, § 541(a), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: “The judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces may administer the oaths authorized by subsections (a) and (b).”

2008—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–181 added subsec. (c).

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–510, § 551(b)(1), struck out “, and have the general powers of a notary public and of a consul of the United States, in the performance of all notarial acts to be executed by members of any of the armed forces, wherever they may be, by persons serving with, employed by, or accompanying the armed forces outside the United States and outside Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, and by other persons subject to this chapter outside of the United States” after “including military justice” in introductory provisions.

Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 101–510, § 551(b)(2), struck out subsecs. (c) and (d) which read as follows:

“(c) No fee may be paid to or received by any person for the performance of any notarial act herein authorized.

“(d) The signature without seal of any such person acting as notary, together with the title of his office, is prima facie evidence of his authority.”

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out “the Canal Zone,” before “Puerto Rico,”.

1986—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 99–661 inserted “or performing inactive-duty training” after “active duty”.

1983—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 98–209, § 2(f)(1), struck out “of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps” after “All judge advocates”.

Subsec. (a)(2) to (7). Pub. L. 98–209, § 2(f)(2), struck out par. (2) which included law specialists among those persons authorized to administer oaths and to act as notaries under this section, and redesignated pars. (3) to (7) as (2) to (6), respectively.

1968—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–632 substituted “military judge” for “law officer” in par. (1).

1967—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 90–179 inserted references to judge advocates of the Navy and the Marine Corps.

1960—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 86–589 permitted the administration of oaths and the performance of notarial acts for persons serving, employed by, or accompanying the armed forces outside the United States and outside the Canal Zone, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by section 5502 of Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–661 effective the earlier of (1) the last day of the 120-day period beginning on Nov. 14, 1986; or (2) the date specified in an Executive order for such amendment to take effect, see section 808 of Pub. L. 99–661, set out as a note under section 802 of this title.

Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–209 effective first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–632 effective first day of tenth month following October 1968, see section 4 of Pub. L. 90–632, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1959–2024 · leading case: United States v. Stuckey, 10 M.J. 347 (1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Stuckey, 10 M.J. 347 (1981). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, under Article 136 of the Uniform Code, 10 U.S.C. § 936 , the authority to administer oaths can be granted by regulations of the armed forces to those persons for whom it is necessary in the performance of their duties; thus, by Service regulations commanders can…”
United States v. Ezell, 6 M.J. 307 (1979). “Nevertheless, the President, acting under the authority of Article II, § 2, of the United States Constitution as commander-in-chief, as contended by Judge Perry, or under Article I, § 8 of the Constitution and Article 36, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 936 , as purported in the government’s…”
United States v. Robert Dezarn, 157 F.3d 1042 (6th Cir. 1998). “One of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation was Defendant Robert De-Zarn.”
United States v. Claypool, 10 C.M.A. 302 (1959). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, it is crystal clear the test in this case is not whether the statement was official but rather whether the investigator was acting beyond the scope of his statutory authority.”
United States v. Cunningham, 44 M.J. 758 (N.M.C.C.A. 1996). “Article 136(a), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 936 (a); Rule for Courts-Martial 307(b), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.”
United States v. Taylor, 64 M.J. 416 (C.A.A.F. 2007). “Article 36(a), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 936 (a), granted the President the authority to prescribe trial procedures, “including modes of proof, .”
MacHinist Mate Second Class Ronald W. Johnson v. John N. Chafee, Sec'y of the Navy, 469 F.2d 1216 (2d Cir. 1973). “The Navy has the statutory power to issue regulations authorizing Naval personnel other than commissioned officers to administer oaths, under 10 U.S.C. § 936 (b)(6), but it has not issued such regulations.”
United States v. Whitaker, 13 C.M.A. 341 (1962). · cites it 2× “” Having been put ppder oath by the investigator pursuant to the authority conferred by Article 136(b)(4), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 936 , accused swore and subscribed to the entire statement.”
United States v. Simmons, 33 M.J. 883 (1991). “Article 136, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 936 , read in conjunction with AR 15-6, gives an investigating officer authority to administer the oath.”
United States v. Willis, 7 M.J. 827 (1979). “Section 502 of Title 10, United States Code prescribes the oath of enlistment which shall be taken by each person enlisting in the Armed Forces and provides that the oath or affirmation “may be taken before any commissioned officer of any armed force”, (underscoring added)…”
United States v. Halley, 34 M.J. 1071 (1992). “” 2 The trial counsel did not ask the military judge to take judicial notice of Article 136, 10 U.S.C. § 936 , nor did the military judge, sua sponte, announce that he, as fact finder, was judicially noting that statutory authority.”
State v. O'Neal, 824 P.2d 967 (Kan. 1992). · cites it 5× “This statute is codified at 10 U.S.C. § 936 (1988). After hearing the parties’ arguments, the district court determined that the restrictions that apply to persons authorized to act as notaries under 10 U.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.