U.S. Code » Title 11 » Chapter CHAPTER 15— ANCILLARY AND OTHER CROSS-BORDER CASES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN COURTS AND FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES

11 U.S.C. § 1525

Cooperation and direct communication between the court and foreign courts or foreign representatives

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Consistent with section 1501, the court shall cooperate to the maximum extent possible with a foreign court or a foreign representative, either directly or through the trustee.(b) The court is entitled to communicate directly with, or to request information or assistance directly from, a foreign court or a foreign representative, subject to the rights of a party in interest to notice and participation.(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, § 801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 143.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: In Re: RCS Capital Dev. v., 728 F.3d 301 (3rd Cir. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re: RCS Capital Dev. v., 728 F.3d 301 (3rd Cir. 2013). “11 U.S.C. § 1525 . Foreign representatives can access U.”
Zhejiang Topoint Photovoltaic Co. v. Zhi Chen (In re Zhejiang Topoint Photovoltaic Co.), 600 B.R. 312 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2019). · cites it 2× “The Defendants also consented and further stated that "Defendants will not be participating in any extra-territorial motion practice, as Defendants have no objection to, and indeed prefer, that Your Honor initiate contact pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1525 (b), in lieu of motions…”
In Re Oi S.A., 587 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018). “§ 1509 (b)(2)-(3) (providing that once recognition is granted in the United States, the foreign representative may apply directly to a court in the United States for appropriate relief in that court and a court in the United States shall grant comity to the foreign…”
Fairfield Sentry Ltd. v. Theodoor GGC Amsterdam (In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.), 452 B.R. 64 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011). “” 16 11 U.S.C. § 1525 . *81 At bottom, adjudication of the Actions in the same forum as the remaining identical Redeemer Actions, the Sentry Direct Action, and the BLMIS Trustee’s Action, is necessary to ease communication and cooperation with the BVI Court, avoid inconsistent…”
In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd., 484 B.R. 615 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013). “§ 1504 (indicating that “any case commenced under Chapter 15 is ‘ancillary’ to a foreign proceeding pending elsewhere”); 11 U.S.C. § 1525 (“[T]he [ancillary] court shall cooperate to the maximum extent possible with a foreign court”) (emphasis added); 11 U.”
Culligan Ltd. & Michael Morrison (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2023). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1525 (a). Upon recognition as a foreign main proceeding, certain relief is automatically granted to the foreign debtor and the foreign representative pursuant to 11 U.”
Wayne Burt Pte. Ltd. (In Liquidation) (Bankr. D.N.J. 2024). “” 11 U.S.C. § 1525 (a). A. Enforcing the Singapore Cetex Order Is Appropriate under 11 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.