11 U.S.C. § 752

Customer property

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 11 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The trustee shall distribute customer property ratably to customers on the basis and to the extent of such customers’ allowed net equity claims and in priority to all other claims, except claims of the kind specified in section 507(a)(2) of this title that are attributable to the administration of such customer property.(b)(1) The trustee shall distribute customer property in excess of that distributed under subsection (a) of this section in accordance with section 726 of this title.(2) Except as provided in section 510 of this title, if a customer is not paid the full amount of such customer’s allowed net equity claim from customer property, the unpaid portion of such claim is a claim entitled to distribution under section 726 of this title.(c) Any cash or security remaining after the liquidation of a security interest created under a security agreement made by the debtor, excluding property excluded under section 741(4)(B) of this title, shall be apportioned between the general estate and customer property in the same proportion as the general estate of the debtor and customer property were subject to such security interest.(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2614; Pub. L. 97–222, § 15, July 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, § 484, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383; Pub. L. 109–8, title XV, § 1502(a)(3), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 216.)Historical and Revision Notessenate report no. 95–989

Section 752(a) requires the trustee to distribute customer property to customers based on the amount of their net equity claims. Customer property is to be distributed in priority to all claims except expenses of administration entitled to priority under § 507(1). It is anticipated that the court will apportion such administrative claims on an equitable basis between the general estate and the customer property of the debtor.

Subsection (b)(1) indicates that in the event customer property exceeds customers net equity claims and administrative expenses, the excess pours over into the general estate. This event would occur if the value of securities increased dramatically after the order for relief but before liquidation by the trustee. Subsection (b)(2) indicates that the unpaid portion of a customer’s net equity claim is entitled to share in the general estate as an unsecured claim unless subordinated by the court under proposed 11 U.S.C. 501. A net equity claim of a customer that is subordinated under section 747 is entitled to share in distribution under section 726(a)(2) unless subordinated under section 510 independently of the subordination under section 747.

Subsection (c) provides for apportionment between customer property and the general estate of any equity of the debtor in property remaining after a secured creditor liquidates a security interest. This might occur if a stockbroker hypothecates securities of his own and of his customers if the value of the hypothecated securities exceeds the debt owed to the secured party. The apportionment is to be made according to the ratio of customer property and general property of the debtor that comprised the collateral. The subsection refers to cash and securities of customers to include any customer property unlawfully converted by the stockbroker in the course of such a transaction. The apportionment is made subject to section 741(4)(B) to insure that property in a customer’s account that is owed to the stockbroker will not be considered customer property. This recognizes the right of the stockbroker to withdraw money that has been erroneously placed in a customer’s account or that is otherwise owing to the stockbroker.

Editorial NotesAmendments

2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–8 substituted “507(a)(2)” for “507(a)(1)”.

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353, § 484(a), substituted “customers’ allowed” for “customers allowed”, “except claims of the kind” for “except claims”, and “such customer property” for “customer property”.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 98–353, § 484(b), substituted “section 726” for “section 726(a)”.

1982—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–222 substituted “Any cash or security remaining after the liquidation of a security interest created under a security agreement made by the debtor, excluding property excluded under section 741(4)(B) of this title, shall be apportioned between the general estate and customer property in the same proportion as the general estate of the debtor and customer property were subject to such security interest” for “Subject to section 741(4)(B) of this title, any cash or security remaining after the liquidation of a security interest created under a security agreement made by the debtor shall be apportioned between the general estate and customer property in the proportion that the general property of the debtor and the cash or securities of customers were subject to such security interest”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1942–2009 · leading case: ASM Capital, LP v. Ames Dep't Stores, Inc. (In Re Ames Dep't Stores, Inc.), 582 F.3d 422 (2d Cir. 2009).
ASM Capital, LP v. Ames Dep't Stores, Inc. (In Re Ames Dep't Stores, Inc.), 582 F.3d 422 (2d Cir. 2009). “§ 348 (d) (excepting claims allowable under § 503(b)), 11 U.S.C. § 752 (a) (excepting claims of the kind specified in § 507(a)(1)), 11 U.”
MicroAge, Inc. v. Viewsonic Corp. (In Re MicroAge, Inc.), 291 B.R. 503 (9th Cir. BAP 2002). “§ 348 (d) (excepting claims allowable under § 503(b)), 11 U.S.C. § 752 (a) (excepting claims of the kind specified in § 507(a)(1)), 11 U.”
First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Lincoln v. Bevill, Bresler & Schulman, Inc. (In Re Bevill, Bresler & Schulman, Inc.), 59 B.R. 353 (D.N.J. 1986). “11 U.S.C. § 752 . Under both the Bankruptcy Code and SIPA, customers’ net equity claims are satisfied from the fund of customer property and all customers share ratably in customer property to the extent of their respective net equity claims.”
United States v. Gen. Eng'g & Mfg. Co., 188 F.2d 80 (8th Cir. 1951). “So also are the rights, duties and liabilities of creditors, § 352, 11 U.S.C.A. § 752 . The debtor, within a time fixed by the court after the acceptance of an arrangement, is required to deposit the consideration to be distributed to creditors and “the money necessary to pay…”
Seedman v. Friedman, 132 F.2d 290 (2d Cir. 1942). “4 The remaining portion of the section, "or of the original petition under chapter 10, 11, 12, or 13 of this Act [title],” obviously does not apply here, where the contract was made after the original petition; and the same is true as to §§ 352 and 378, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 752 , 778.…”
Miller v. Woolley, 141 F.2d 837 (9th Cir. 1944). “” 5 11 U.S.C.A. § 752 . “Rights, duties and liabilities of creditors, etc.”
Golden Enter., Inc. v. United States, 566 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir. 1977). · cites it 2× “The first order has equal standing, by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 752 , of any order entered in a voluntary bankruptcy case after adjudication, and a petition for an arrangement is the equivalent of a petition for voluntary bankruptcy.”
Schneidmiller v. Engstrom, 177 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1949). “Since Section 352 of Chapter 11, 11 U.S.C.A. § 752 , treats a petition for arrangement filed under Section 322 of Chap *197 ter 11, 11 U.”
In re Oliver, 127 F. Supp. 842 (D. Kan. 1955). “§ 741 ], Chapter XI, and Section 641 of Chapter XIII, which defines the rights, duties and liabilities of creditors, is the same as Section 352 of Chapter XI [ 11 U.S.C.A. § 752 ], It is, therefore, proper to examine what the courts have said in construing Chapter XI.”
In re California Paving Co., 95 F. Supp. 909 (N.D. Cal. 1951). “§ 752 , wherein the Bankruptcy Act provides: “Where not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter, the rights, duties, and liabilities of creditors and of all other persons with respect to the property of the debtor shall be the same * * * where a petition is filed under…”
City of Elkins v. Davidson (In re Swink), 142 B.R. 874 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1992). · cites it 3× “§ 741 and, therefore, entitled to a priority status pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 752 . The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.”
In Re: Ames Dep't. Stores, Inc. (2d Cir. 2009). “§ 348 (d) (excepting claims allowable under § 503(b)), 11 U.S.C. § 752 (a) 9 (excepting claims of the kind specified in § 507(a)(1)), 11 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.