12 U.S.C. § 1441a

Repealed. Pub. L. 111–203, title III, § 364(b), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1555

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 518 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). · cites it 10× “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). · cites it 15× “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc., 101 F.3d 1492 (3rd Cir. 1996). · cites it 16× “§ 1367 to provide the federal courts with the discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in the situation that we face here? Second, if this was Congress' intent, does this grant of jurisdiction exceed the scope of Article III of the United States Constitution? Because it…”
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). · cites it 13× “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
Circle Indus., Div. of Nastasi-White, Inc. v. City Fed. Sav. Bank, 749 F. Supp. 447 (E.D.N.Y 1990). · cites it 7× “(See 12 U.S.C. § 1441a[b][10][F] [RTC has the power “[t]o sue and be sued in its corporate capacity in any court of competent jurisdiction”]) Cognizant of the fact that it must decide the defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) motion first (see Rhulen Agency, Inc.”
Osborn v. Haley, 549 U.S. 225 (2007). · cites it 2× “, 12 U.S.C. § 1441a( l )(3)(C) ("The Corporation may appeal any order of remand entered by a United States district court"); § 1819(b)(2)(C) (same); 25 U.”
Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 16 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1994). · cites it 7× “The D’Oench doctrine applies to the RTC when it acts, as in the instant case, in its capacity as receiver, see 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(4)(A), and extends to the financial interests of any wholly owned subsidiaries of a failed institution, see Oliver v.”
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 5 F.3d 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1993). · cites it 5× “183 (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1441a, 1811 et seq.). Pursuant to its statutory authority, the RTC acts as receiver for hundreds of failed thrifts, succeeding to the entirety of each association’s rights, assets, and obligations.”
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp., 56 F.3d 1497 (D.C. Cir. 1995). · cites it 4× “See 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(l). In short, these plaintiffs have no “reasonable expectation” of returning to the RTC and being subjected to the same treatment as before.”
Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Servs., Inc., 551 U.S. 224 (2007). · cites it 2× “, 12 U.S.C. § 1441a( l )(3)(c), § 1819(b)(2)(C); 25 U.”
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust, 547 U.S. 633 (2006). · cites it 2× “, § 1447(d); 12 U. S. C. § 1441a( l )(3)(C); § 1819(b)(2)(C); 25 U.”
Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, 743 F. Supp. 38 (D.D.C. 1990). · cites it 7× “Based on his reading of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(/)(3), the suit could not be removed to the federal court in Minnesota, but could only have been removed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(1) — 4 cases
Nieto v. Univ. of New Mexico, 727 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (D.N.M. 2010).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(1)(1) — 3 cases
New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc., 101 F.3d 1492 (3rd Cir. 1996). “§ 1367 to provide the federal courts with the discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in the situation that we face here? Second, if this was Congress' intent, does this grant of jurisdiction exceed the scope of Article III of the United States Constitution? Because it…”
Karol v. Resolution Trust Corp., 839 F. Supp. 14 (E.D. Tex. 1993).
Facemire v. Konover Mgmt. South, 804 F. Supp. 1465 (S.D. Ala. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(1)(3) — 2 cases
In Re Audre, Inc., 216 B.R. 19 (9th Cir. BAP 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lightfoot, 938 F.2d 65 (7th Cir. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(14) — 1 case
Joslin v. Grossman, 107 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D. Conn. 2000).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(7)(l) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(I) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Westgate Partners, Ltd., 937 F.2d 526 (10th Cir. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(I)(1) — 1 case
Belgiovine Enter., Inc. v. City Fed. Sav. Bank, 748 F. Supp. 33 (D.D.C. 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(I)(3) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z) — 11 cases
Sawyer v. USAA Ins., 839 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D.N.M. 2012).
Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, 743 F. Supp. 38 (D.D.C. 1990). “Based on his reading of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(/)(3), the suit could not be removed to the federal court in Minnesota, but could only have been removed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Sloan, 775 F. Supp. 326 (E.D. Ark. 1991).
United Sav. Bank v. Rose, 752 F. Supp. 506 (D.D.C. 1990).
Philpott v. Resolution Trust Corp., 739 F. Supp. 380 (N.D. Ill. 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(1) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Henry Chapman, 29 F.3d 1120 (7th Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(2) — 2 cases
Hellon & Assocs., Inc. v. Phoenix Resort Corp., 755 F. Supp. 280 (D. Ariz. 1990).
Montalvo Santiago v. Resolution Trust Corp., 779 F. Supp. 632 (D.P.R. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(3) — 20 cases
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, 743 F. Supp. 38 (D.D.C. 1990). “Based on his reading of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(/)(3), the suit could not be removed to the federal court in Minnesota, but could only have been removed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.”
Nieto v. Univ. of New Mexico, 727 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (D.N.M. 2010).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Key, 733 F. Supp. 1086 (N.D. Tex. 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(3)(A) — 5 cases
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Sawyer v. USAA Ins., 839 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D.N.M. 2012).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(3)(A)(i) — 3 cases
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. North Savannah Props., LLC, 686 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2012).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fragetti, 49 F.3d 715 (11th Cir. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(3)(B) — 4 cases
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Fragetti, 49 F.3d 715 (11th Cir. 1995).
Ventana Investments v. 909 Corp., 71 F.3d 168 (5th Cir. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(3)(C) — 2 cases
Osborn v. Haley, 549 U.S. 225 (2007). “, 12 U.S.C. § 1441a( l )(3)(C) ("The Corporation may appeal any order of remand entered by a United States district court"); § 1819(b)(2)(C) (same); 25 U.”
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust, 547 U.S. 633 (2006). “, § 1447(d); 12 U. S. C. § 1441a( l )(3)(C); § 1819(b)(2)(C); 25 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(Z)(l) — 20 cases
Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, 743 F. Supp. 38 (D.D.C. 1990). “Based on his reading of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(/)(3), the suit could not be removed to the federal court in Minnesota, but could only have been removed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.”
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 5 F.3d 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “183 (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1441a, 1811 et seq.). Pursuant to its statutory authority, the RTC acts as receiver for hundreds of failed thrifts, succeeding to the entirety of each association’s rights, assets, and obligations.”
Lindley v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 733 F.3d 1043 (11th Cir. 2013).
Adair v. Lease Partners, Inc., 587 F.3d 238 (5th Cir. 2009).
Carney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 19 F.3d 950 (5th Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a) — 3 cases
Tackett v. First Sav. of Arkansas, FA, 810 S.W.2d 927 (Ark. 1991).
Costa v. Resolution Trust Corp., 789 F. Supp. 43 (D. Mass. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(1) — 1 case
Glen Johnson, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 598 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(11) — 3 cases
Lesal Interiors, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 834 F. Supp. 721 (D.N.J. 1993).
S1 IL304 Ltd. Liab. Co. v. ANB Cust. for LG Ex Rel. Hynes, 950 F. Supp. 242 (N.D. Ill. 1996).
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. McGlamery, 74 F.3d 218 (10th Cir. 1996).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14) — 2 cases
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(A) — 1 case
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B) — 2 cases
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
United States v. Bald Eagle Realty, 1 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (D. Utah 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(iv) — 1 case
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii) — 3 cases
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
United States v. Bald Eagle Realty, 1 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (D. Utah 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(xvii) — 1 case
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(3) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(3)(A) — 1 case
Delta Sav. Bank v. United States, 265 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2001).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(5)(E) — 1 case
Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker, 758 F. Supp. 1340 (C.D. Cal. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(5)(I) — 1 case
Scfc Ilc, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., 784 F. Supp. 822 (D. Utah 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(7) — 4 cases
Centrust Sav. Bank v. Paul, 121 F.3d 635 (11th Cir. 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1992).
Overton v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 812 (Fed. Cl. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(8) — 1 case
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(l) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Davis, 779 F. Supp. 181 (D.D.C. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(ll) — 9 cases
Richard Roe v. John O'DOnOhue, 38 F.3d 298 (7th Cir. 1994).
Casey v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 583 F.3d 586 (8th Cir. 2009).
Resolution Trust Corp v. Carr, 13 F.3d 425 (1st Cir. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b) — 38 cases
California Hous. Sec., Inc. v. The United States, 959 F.2d 955 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Suess v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 89 (Fed. Cl. 1995).
Nat'l Enter., Inc. v. Paul Smith, 114 F.3d 561 (6th Cir. 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 137 F.R.D. 634 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(1) — 2 cases
Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp., 635 A.2d 394 (Md. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. State of Cal., 851 F. Supp. 1453 (C.D. Cal. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(1)(A) — 3 cases
Twenty First Century Recovery, Ltd. v. Mase, 665 N.E.2d 573 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Town of Highland Beach, 18 F.3d 1536 (11th Cir. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hunters Ridge Income Investors, 796 F. Supp. 1261 (E.D. Mo. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(1)(B) — 7 cases
Simard v. Resolution Trust Corp., 639 A.2d 540 (D.C. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Nernberg, 3 F.3d 62 (3rd Cir. 1993).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Maldonado, 595 So. 2d 774 (La. Ct. App. 1992).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 796 F. Supp. 1233 (D. Minnesota 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(1)(C) — 1 case
Garrett v. Commonwealth Mortg. Corp. of Am., 938 F.2d 591 (5th Cir. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(10)(A) — 1 case
Adair v. Rose Law Firm, 867 F. Supp. 1111 (D.D.C. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(10)(B) — 3 cases
First Nationwide Bank v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Centex Corp. v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 691 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Temple-Inland, Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 550 (Fed. Cl. 2004).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(10)(F) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Plumlee, 745 F. Supp. 1462 (E.D. Ark. 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(10)(J) — 1 case
IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 803 F. Supp. 878 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(10)(M) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(11)(A) — 1 case
United States v. Hunton & Williams, 952 F. Supp. 843 (D.D.C. 1997).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(11)(B) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(12) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(12)(A) — 2 cases
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(12)(G) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Thornton, 798 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(14) — 4 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. S & K CHEVROLET, 868 F. Supp. 1047 (C.D. Ill. 1994).
RTC Mortg. Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 16 F. Supp. 2d 557 (D.N.J. 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(14)(A)(i) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. S & K CHEVROLET, 868 F. Supp. 1047 (C.D. Ill. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(14)(c) — 1 case
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(2) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3) — 18 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Youngblood, 807 F. Supp. 765 (N.D. Ga. 1992).
North Arkansas Med. Ctr. v. Barrett, 962 F.2d 780 (8th Cir. 1992).
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Crosby, 774 F. Supp. 584 (W.D. Wash. 1991).
Monument Square Assocs., Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 792 F. Supp. 874 (D. Mass. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(A) — 15 cases
Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker, 758 F. Supp. 1340 (C.D. Cal. 1991).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Int'l Ins., 770 F. Supp. 300 (E.D. La. 1991).
Jordan v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 240 F. Supp. 3d 1114 (E.D. Wash. 2017).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 915 F. Supp. 584 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
Orchard Hills Coop. Apts., Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 779 F. Supp. 104 (C.D. Ill. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(A)(i) — 2 cases
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 529 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 915 F. Supp. 584 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(A)(ii) — 1 case
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Gillard, 740 F. Supp. 427 (N.D. Tex. 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(A)(l) — 1 case
United States v. Hunton & Williams, 952 F. Supp. 843 (D.D.C. 1997).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(B) — 1 case
U.S. Leasing Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 825 F. Supp. 336 (D.D.C. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(C) — 12 cases
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 5 F.3d 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “183 (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1441a, 1811 et seq.). Pursuant to its statutory authority, the RTC acts as receiver for hundreds of failed thrifts, succeeding to the entirety of each association’s rights, assets, and obligations.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 137 F.R.D. 634 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Feffer, 793 F. Supp. 11 (D.D.C. 1992).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 801 F. Supp. 1152 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(C)(I) — 1 case
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(C)(i) — 11 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Grant Thornton, 41 F.3d 1539 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro, 658 A.2d 282 (N.J. 1995).
New Hampshire Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 978 F. Supp. 650 (D. Maryland 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(C)(ii) — 3 cases
Waterview Mgmt. Co. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 105 F.3d 696 (D.C. Cir. 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 801 F. Supp. 1152 (S.D.N.Y. 1992).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(C)(iv) — 2 cases
In Re Sealed Case (Admin. Subpoena), 42 F.3d 1412 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(C)(v) — 2 cases
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(D) — 1 case
Glen Johnson, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 598 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(3)(c)(I) — 1 case
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(4) — 105 cases
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(4)(A) — 68 cases
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Atherton v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 519 U.S. 213 (1997).
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 265 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 5 F.3d 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “183 (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1441a, 1811 et seq.). Pursuant to its statutory authority, the RTC acts as receiver for hundreds of failed thrifts, succeeding to the entirety of each association’s rights, assets, and obligations.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(5) — 2 cases
Hindes v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 137 F.3d 148 (3rd Cir. 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(5)(A) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Youngblood, 807 F. Supp. 765 (N.D. Ga. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(6) — 20 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F. Supp. 915 (N.D. Ill. 1991).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Holmes, 846 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D. Tex. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Eugenio, 790 F. Supp. 686 (N.D. Tex. 1991).
North Arkansas Med. Ctr. v. Barrett, 962 F.2d 780 (8th Cir. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(7) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(8) — 1 case
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(8)(A) — 1 case
Forkkio, Samuel E. v. Powell, Donald, 306 F.3d 1127 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(9) — 2 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand, 915 F. Supp. 584 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
RTC Mortg. Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 16 F. Supp. 2d 557 (D.N.J. 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(9)(D) — 1 case
RTC Mortg. Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 16 F. Supp. 2d 557 (D.N.J. 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(9)(E) — 4 cases
Franklin Sav. Corp. v. United States, 970 F. Supp. 855 (D. Kan. 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Miramon, 935 F. Supp. 838 (E.D. La. 1996).
Franklin Sav. Corp. v. United States, 180 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 1999).
Crowe v. Smith, 852 F. Supp. 533 (W.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(9)(M) — 1 case
RTC Mortg. Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins., 16 F. Supp. 2d 557 (D.N.J. 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(l) — 16 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Farmer, 865 F. Supp. 1143 (E.D. Pa. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Shehu (In Re Shehu), 128 B.R. 26 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1991).
Est. of Harding Ex Rel. Williams v. Bell, 817 F. Supp. 1186 (D.N.J. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(l)(A) — 14 cases
Am. Broad. Companies v. Gill, 6 S.W.3d 19 (Tex. App. 1999).
WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortg. Corp., 856 F. Supp. 1076 (E.D. Va. 1994).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Holmes, 846 F. Supp. 1310 (S.D. Tex. 1994).
Union Recovery Ltd. P'ship v. Horton, 477 S.E.2d 521 (Va. 1996).
Scott v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re Scott), 157 B.R. 297 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(l)(B) — 9 cases
New Hampshire Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 978 F. Supp. 650 (D. Maryland 1997).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Miramon, 935 F. Supp. 838 (E.D. La. 1996).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. City of Scottsdale, 866 P.2d 902 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993).
Orchard Hills Coop. Apts., Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 779 F. Supp. 104 (C.D. Ill. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(l)(C) — 7 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Krantz, 757 F. Supp. 915 (N.D. Ill. 1991).
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Gillard, 740 F. Supp. 427 (N.D. Tex. 1990).
Lloyd v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 812 F. Supp. 293 (D.R.I. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(ll)(A) — 1 case
Overton v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 812 (Fed. Cl. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(ll)(B) — 2 cases
Flagship Fed. Sav. Bank v. Wall, 748 F. Supp. 742 (S.D. Cal. 1990).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(ll)(B)(iii) — 1 case
Burt K. Fischer v. Resolution Trust Corp., 59 F.3d 1344 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(ll)(G) — 2 cases
United States v. Heffner, 85 F.3d 435 (9th Cir. 1996).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c) — 3 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Charles House Condo. Ass'n, 853 F. Supp. 226 (E.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(1) — 1 case
Akinseye v. Bigos, 75 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D. Minnesota 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(11)(B) — 6 cases
Akinseye v. Bigos, 75 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D. Minnesota 1998).
Witkowski v. Brian, Fooshee & Yonge Props., 181 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App. 2005).
Bolden v. KB HOME, 618 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(17) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(17)(C) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(2)(B) — 1 case
Lopez-Flores v. Resolution Trust Corp., 93 F. Supp. 2d 834 (E.D. Mich. 2000).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(2)(b) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Charles House Condo. Ass'n, 853 F. Supp. 226 (E.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(3) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(3)(E)(I) — 1 case
Akinseye v. Bigos, 75 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D. Minnesota 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(4)(A) — 1 case
Akinseye v. Bigos, 75 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D. Minnesota 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(5) — 1 case
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(9)(D) — 3 cases
Witkowski v. Brian, Fooshee & Yonge Props., 181 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. App. 2005).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(9)(E) — 2 cases
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(9)(E)(i) — 1 case
19 Court Street Assocs., LLC v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re 19 Court Street Assocs., LLC), 190 B.R. 983 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996). “The sections of FIRREA allegedly violated were: (1) 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(a)(14)(B)(viii), which requires the RTC to engage in fair and consistent treatment of offerors for assets of which it has been appointed receiver; (2) 12 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(c)(9)(G) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Charles House Condo. Ass'n, 853 F. Supp. 226 (E.D. La. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(e)(l) — 1 case
Jones v. Resolution Trust Corp., 7 F.3d 1006 (11th Cir. 1993).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(f)(lXD) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(g) — 3 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. City of Scottsdale, 866 P.2d 902 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro, 658 A.2d 282 (N.J. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i) — 11 cases
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Sawyer v. USAA Ins., 839 F. Supp. 2d 1189 (D.N.M. 2012).
Philpott v. Resolution Trust Corp., 739 F. Supp. 380 (N.D. Ill. 1990).
RTC Com. Loan Trust 1995-NP1A v. Winthrop Mgmt., 923 F. Supp. 83 (E.D. Va. 1996).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(1) — 2 cases
Adams v. Madison Realty & Dev., Inc., 937 F.2d 845 (3rd Cir. 1991).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lightfoot, 938 F.2d 65 (7th Cir. 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(2) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(3) — 18 cases
Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, 743 F. Supp. 38 (D.D.C. 1990). “Based on his reading of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(/)(3), the suit could not be removed to the federal court in Minnesota, but could only have been removed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Key, 733 F. Supp. 1086 (N.D. Tex. 1990).
Est. of Harding Ex Rel. Williams v. Bell, 817 F. Supp. 1186 (D.N.J. 1993).
Hellon & Assocs., Inc. v. Phoenix Resort Corp., 958 F.2d 295 (9th Cir. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(3)(A) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(3)(A)(i) — 1 case
Tackett v. California Indep. Trust Deed, 859 F. Supp. 1289 (C.D. Cal. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(3)(B) — 2 cases
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(i)(l) — 15 cases
Decrosta v. Red Carpet Inns Int'l, Inc., 767 F. Supp. 694 (E.D. Pa. 1991).
Goodman v. Resolution Trust Corp., 7 F.3d 1123 (4th Cir. 1993).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Plumlee, 745 F. Supp. 1462 (E.D. Ark. 1990).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Camhi, 861 F. Supp. 1121 (D. Conn. 1994).
Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, FSB, 759 F. Supp. 542 (D. Minnesota 1991).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(k)(1)(B) — 1 case
Grant Thornton v. Off. of Comptroller, Currency, 514 F.3d 1328 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(k)(l)(B) — 1 case
Grant Thornton v. Off. of Comptroller, Currency, 514 F.3d 1328 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l) — 11 cases
New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc., 101 F.3d 1492 (3rd Cir. 1996). “§ 1367 to provide the federal courts with the discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in the situation that we face here? Second, if this was Congress' intent, does this grant of jurisdiction exceed the scope of Article III of the United States Constitution? Because it…”
John Hinkley v. Envoy Air, Inc., 968 F.3d 544 (5th Cir. 2020).
Nieto v. Univ. of New Mexico, 727 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (D.N.M. 2010).
Armstrong v. Resolution Trust Corp., 623 N.E.2d 291 (Ill. 1993).
RTC Com. Loan Trust 1995-NP1A v. Winthrop Mgmt., 923 F. Supp. 83 (E.D. Va. 1996).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(1) — 22 cases
New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc., 101 F.3d 1492 (3rd Cir. 1996). “§ 1367 to provide the federal courts with the discretion to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in the situation that we face here? Second, if this was Congress' intent, does this grant of jurisdiction exceed the scope of Article III of the United States Constitution? Because it…”
Spear Mktg., Inc. v. BancorpSouth Bank, 791 F.3d 586 (5th Cir. 2015).
Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 5 F.3d 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “183 (codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. §§ 1441a, 1811 et seq.). Pursuant to its statutory authority, the RTC acts as receiver for hundreds of failed thrifts, succeeding to the entirety of each association’s rights, assets, and obligations.”
Adair v. Lease Partners, Inc., 587 F.3d 238 (5th Cir. 2009).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(2) — 2 cases
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Eugenio, 790 F. Supp. 686 (N.D. Tex. 1991).
Facemire v. Konover Mgmt. South, 804 F. Supp. 1465 (S.D. Ala. 1992).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(3) — 17 cases
Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 16 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1994). “The D’Oench doctrine applies to the RTC when it acts, as in the instant case, in its capacity as receiver, see 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(4)(A), and extends to the financial interests of any wholly owned subsidiaries of a failed institution, see Oliver v.”
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Berke v. Resolution Trust Corp., 483 N.W.2d 712 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Eugenio, 790 F. Supp. 686 (N.D. Tex. 1991).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Allen, 16 F.3d 568 (4th Cir. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(3)(A) — 3 cases
Sweeney v. Resolution Trust Corp., 16 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1994). “The D’Oench doctrine applies to the RTC when it acts, as in the instant case, in its capacity as receiver, see 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b)(4)(A), and extends to the financial interests of any wholly owned subsidiaries of a failed institution, see Oliver v.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Nernberg, 3 F.3d 62 (3rd Cir. 1993).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Harrison, 871 F. Supp. 523 (D. Mass. 1994).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(3)(A)(i) — 2 cases
Buczkowski, Donald v. FDIC (7th Cir. 2005).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(3)(B) — 4 cases
Resolution Trust Corp., as Conservator for Great Am. First Sav. Bank v. Bayside Developers, 43 F.3d 1230 (1st Cir. 1995). “Therefore, this court must first look to the plain language of 12 U.S.C. § 1441a. The plain language of 12 U.”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Harrison, 871 F. Supp. 523 (D. Mass. 1994).
Buczkowski, Donald v. FDIC (7th Cir. 2005).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(3)(C) — 1 case
Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Servs., Inc., 551 U.S. 224 (2007). “, 12 U.S.C. § 1441a( l )(3)(c), § 1819(b)(2)(C); 25 U.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(l)(l) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Young, 925 F. Supp. 164 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m) — 14 cases
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 529 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Glass v. United States, 258 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(1) — 11 cases
Bailey v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 251 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States, 54 Fed. Cl. 529 (Fed. Cl. 2002).
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 265 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Schock v. United States, 56 F. Supp. 2d 185 (D.R.I. 1999).
Burkett v. Resolution Trust Corp., 757 So. 2d 819 (La. Ct. App. 2000).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(2) — 16 cases
Castle v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 187 (Fed. Cl. 2000).
Hansen Bancorp, Inc. v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 168 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United States, 366 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. United States, 51 Fed. Cl. 265 (Fed. Cl. 2001).
Statesman Sav. Holding Corp. v. United States, 41 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 1998).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(l) — 46 cases
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Castle v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 187 (Fed. Cl. 2000).
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp., 56 F.3d 1497 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “See 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(l). In short, these plaintiffs have no “reasonable expectation” of returning to the RTC and being subjected to the same treatment as before.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(n)(3) — 1 case
Burt K. Fischer v. Resolution Trust Corp., 59 F.3d 1344 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(n)(6) — 1 case
Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp., 112 F.3d 569 (1st Cir. 1997).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(n)(6)(A) — 1 case
Burt K. Fischer v. Resolution Trust Corp., 59 F.3d 1344 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(n)(6)(D) — 1 case
Burt K. Fischer v. Resolution Trust Corp., 59 F.3d 1344 (D.C. Cir. 1995).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(o) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(o)(2) — 1 case
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(q) — 10 cases
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Veitch, D. Philip v. England, Gordon R., 471 F.3d 124 (D.C. Cir. 2006).
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp., 56 F.3d 1497 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “See 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(l). In short, these plaintiffs have no “reasonable expectation” of returning to the RTC and being subjected to the same treatment as before.”
Koszola v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 393 F.3d 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Moore v. Chertoff, 437 F. Supp. 2d 156 (D.D.C. 2006).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(q)(3) — 2 cases
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp., 56 F.3d 1497 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “See 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(l). In short, these plaintiffs have no “reasonable expectation” of returning to the RTC and being subjected to the same treatment as before.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(q)(5) — 2 cases
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Koszola v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 393 F.3d 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(q)(8)(B)(i) — 1 case
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(q)(l) — 3 cases
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. & Ricki Helfer, Chairman, Fdic, 132 F.3d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “12 U.S.C. § 1441a(b). With the exception of its CEO, the RTC had no employees of its own; it drew them instead from the FDIC.”
Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp., 56 F.3d 1497 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “See 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(m)(l). In short, these plaintiffs have no “reasonable expectation” of returning to the RTC and being subjected to the same treatment as before.”
Koszola v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 393 F.3d 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(r) — 1 case
Davis-Warren Auctioneers, J v. v. Fed. Deposit Ins., 215 F.3d 1159 (10th Cir. 2000).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(w)(17)(b) — 1 case
Fox v. Portico Reality Servs. Off., 739 F. Supp. 2d 912 (E.D. Va. 2010).
— 12 U.S.C. § 1441a(w)(19)(B) — 1 case
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond, 18 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.