12 U.S.C. § 2901
Congressional findings and statement of purpose
(a) The Congress finds that—(1) regulated financial institutions are required by law to demonstrate that their deposit facilities serve the convenience and needs of the communities in which they are chartered to do business;(2) the convenience and needs of communities include the need for credit services as well as deposit services; and(3) regulated financial institutions have continuing and affirmative obligation to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they are chartered.(b) It is the purpose of this chapter to require each appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency to use its authority when examining financial institutions, to encourage such institutions to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they are chartered consistent with the safe and sound operation of such institutions.(Pub. L. 95–128, title VIII, § 802, Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1147.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesShort TitlePub. L. 95–128, title VIII, § 801, Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1147, provided that: “This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Community Reinvestment Act of 1977’.”
Responsiveness to Community Needs for Financial ServicesPub. L. 106–102, title VII, § 715, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1470, provided that:“(a)Study.—The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Federal banking agencies (as defined in section 3(z) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1813(z)]), shall conduct a study of the extent to which adequate services are being provided as intended by the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 [12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.], including services in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods and for persons of modest means, as a result of the enactment of this Act [see Tables for classification].“(b)Reports.—“(1)In general.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall—“(A) before March 15, 2000, submit a baseline report to the Congress on the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a); and“(B) before the end of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 12, 1999], in consultation with the Federal banking agencies, submit a final report to the Congress on the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a).“(2)Recommendations.—The final report submitted under paragraph (1)(B) shall include such recommendations as the Secretary determines to be appropriate for administrative and legislative action with respect to institutions covered under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 [12 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.].”
Report on Community Development LendingPub. L. 102–550, title IX, § 910, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3874, provided that not later than 12 months after Oct. 28, 1992, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall submit a report to Congress comparing residential, small business, and commercial lending by insured depository institutions in low-income, minority, and distressed neighborhoods to such lending in other neighborhoods, with the report to contain comparisons of relevant risks and reasons for different lending practices.
Notes of Decisions
Coll. Corner, L.P. v. Dep't of Local Gov't Fin., 840 N.E.2d 905 (Ind. T.C. 2006).
· cites it 2× “) In partnering with ONF to help restore College Corner, NCCDC was acting pursuant to the directives of the federal Community Reinvestment Act, which encourages financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they are chartered.”
Leweling v. Schnadig Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1107 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995).
· cites it 2× “2d 378 , the seventh circuit rejected a bank manager's claim of retaliatory discharge when he informed Federal banking officials of his employer's deficiencies under the Community Reinvestment Act (the Act) ( 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq (1977).) The court noted that the Act's…”
Yabsley v. Conover, 644 F. Supp. 689 (N.D. Ill. 1986).
· cites it 3× “Count IX alleges that the bank defendants violated the Community Reinvestment Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 . In Count X, the plaintiffs allege that the bank defendants violated section 14(a) of the 1934 Act, 15 U.”
Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp., 736 F. Supp. 812 (N.D. Ill. 1990).
· cites it 3× “12 U.S.C.A. § 2901 , et seq. (1989). Plaintiff alleged that Clyde was in violation of the CRA and plaintiff's attempts to inform defendant of its noncompliance with the CRA and his attempts to bring defendant into compliance with the CRA led to defendant's firing of plaintiff.”
Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp., 970 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1992).
· cites it 2× “The primary question raised, in this appeal is whether, under Illinois law, an employee can maintain an action for retaliatory discharge when he alleges that he was terminated for urging his employer’s compliance with the Federal Community Reinvestment Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 , et…”
Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp., 767 F. Supp. 167 (N.D. Ill. 1991).
“Plaintiff was fired after seven months of employment at Clyde Federal for informing Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”) officials that Clyde Federal was not in compliance with the Federal Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq. (1977). Plaintiff, a…”
Lee v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 923 F. Supp. 451 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
“This approval was based in part on the OCC’s determination that Chase was in compliance with its statutory obligations under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2901 et seq. (1977). Plaintiffs have filed a complaint before this court, pursuant to the…”
Hicks v. Clyde Fed. Sav. & Loan, 696 F. Supp. 387 (N.D. Ill. 1988).
· cites it 2× “In Count II, Hicks claims that while employed as an officer at Clyde Federal, he was in charge of making sure that Clyde Federal followed the Federal Community Reinvestment Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2901 , et seq. (“FCRA”). According to Hicks, during his employment he became aware that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.