12 U.S.C. § 2903

Financial institutions; evaluation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In generalIn connection with its examination of a financial institution, the appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency shall—(1) assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of such institution; and(2) take such record into account in its evaluation of an application for a deposit facility by such institution.(b) Majority-owned institutions

In assessing and taking into account, under subsection (a), the record of a nonminority-owned and nonwomen-owned financial institution, the appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency may consider as a factor capital investment, loan participation, and other ventures undertaken by the institution in cooperation with minority- and women-owned financial institutions and low-income credit unions provided that these activities help meet the credit needs of local communities in which such institutions and credit unions are chartered.

(c) Financial holding company requirement(1) In generalAn election by a bank holding company to become a financial holding company under section 1843 of this title shall not be effective if—(A) the Board finds that, as of the date the declaration of such election and the certification is filed by such holding company under section 1843(l)(1)(C) 11 See References in Text note below. of this title, not all of the subsidiary insured depository institutions of the bank holding company had achieved a rating of “satisfactory record of meeting community credit needs”, or better, at the most recent examination of each such institution; and(B) the Board notifies the company of such finding before the end of the 30-day period beginning on such date.(2) Limited exclusions for newly acquired insured depository institutionsAny insured depository institution acquired by a bank holding company during the 12-month period preceding the date of the submission to the Board of the declaration and certification under section 1843(l)(1)(C) ¹ of this title may be excluded for purposes of paragraph (1) during the 12-month period beginning on the date of such acquisition if—(A) the bank holding company has submitted an affirmative plan to the appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency to take such action as may be necessary in order for such institution to achieve a rating of “satisfactory record of meeting community credit needs”, or better, at the next examination of the institution; and(B) the plan has been accepted by such agency.(3) DefinitionsFor purposes of this subsection, the following definitions shall apply:(A) Bank holding company; financial holding company

The terms “bank holding company” and “financial holding company” have the meanings given those terms in section 1841 of this title.

(B) Board

The term “Board” means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

The term “insured depository institution” has the meaning given the term in section 1813(c) of this title.

(d) Low-cost education loans

In assessing and taking into account, under subsection (a), the record of a financial institution, the appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency shall consider, as a factor, low-cost education loans provided by the financial institution to low-income borrowers.

(Pub. L. 95–128, title VIII, § 804, Oct. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 1148; Pub. L. 102–550, title IX, § 909(1), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3874; Pub. L. 106–102, title I, § 103(b), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1350; Pub. L. 110–315, title X, § 1031(a), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3488.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 1843(l)(1)(C) of this title, referred to in subsec. (c)(1)(A), (2), was redesignated section 1843(l)(1)(D) of this title by Pub. L. 111–203, title VI, § 606(a)(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1607.

Amendments

2008—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 110–315 added subsec. (d).

1999—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–102 added subsec. (c).

1992—Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–102 effective 120 days after Nov. 12, 1999, see section 161 of Pub. L. 106–102, set out as a note under section 24 of this title.

Regulations

Pub. L. 110–315, title X, § 1031(b), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3488, provided that: “Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 14, 2008], each appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency shall issue rules in final form to implement section 804(d) of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 [12 U.S.C. 2903(d)], as added by this section.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2024 · leading case: Powell v. Am. Gen. Fin., Inc., 310 F. Supp. 2d 481 (N.D.N.Y. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Powell v. Am. Gen. Fin., Inc., 310 F. Supp. 2d 481 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). “See 12 U.S.C. § 2903 (a)(1). The statute has no sharply delineated standards.”

Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp., 736 F. Supp. 812 (N.D. Ill. 1990). · cites it 2× “) 12 U.S.C.A. § 2903 (1989). Section 2906 provides for the appropriate federal supervisory agency to generate written evaluations detailing an institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of the entire community and the facts relied upon and conclusions reached by the agency.”

People Ex Rel. Sepulveda v. Highland Fed. Sav. & Loan, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2989 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993). “Nonetheless, they urge us to uphold that ruling on the additional grounds of federal preemption based on the Federal Fair Housing Act of 1986 ( 12 U.”

Inner City Press/Cmty. on the Move v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys., 380 F. Supp. 2d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “” 12 U.S.C. § 2903 ; cf. also Lee v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed.”

Nat'l State Bank v. Long, 630 F.2d 981 (3rd Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “The Community Reinvestment Act requires the appropriate federal supervisory agency to assess an institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of the entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, 12 U.S.C. § 2903 (1), and simultaneously to encourage the…”

Hicks v. Resolution Trust Corp., 970 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1992). “” 12 U.S.C. § 2903 . As such, we do not see how the Act’s policy would be frustrated by declining to recognize Hicks’ claim for retaliatory discharge — Clyde Federal would not really suffer any penalty whether Hicks kept quiet or not.”

Jones v. Off. of Comptroller of Currency, 983 F. Supp. 197 (D.D.C. 1997). “’’ 12 U.S.C. § 2903 (1). Admin. Rec., Vol. 2, 1136.”

Connecticut Bankers Ass'n v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 627 F.2d 245 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “The other issue involved the applicability of various factors laid out in the Community Reinvestment Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2903 (Supp. I 1977). The Board found the Act inapplicable to an application by a bank holding company to engage in second mortgage lending and the sale of credit…”

Washington v. Off. of the Comptroller of the Currency, 856 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir. 1988). “While we recognize that the Congress has expressed an especial interest in the encouragement by OCC of banks under its jurisdiction to meet the goals of the Community Reinvestment Act and particularly “to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they are…”

Texas Bankers Ass'n v. Off. of the Comptroller of the Currency (N.D. Tex. 2024). · cites it 6× “12 U.S.C. § 2903 (a)(1). And it requires separate evaluations for each metropolitan area where an institution maintains one or more branch offices.”

Nat'l State Bank, Elizabeth, NJ v. Long, 469 F. Supp. 1068 (D.N.J. 1979). “12 U.S.C. § 2903 (1). Furthermore, the appropriate federal agency is to consider such record in evaluating an institution’s application for a “deposit facility”.”

Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Castetter, 184 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 1999). “” 12 U.S.C.A. § 2903 (a)(1) (West Supp.1999).”

Show all 15 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.