12 U.S.C. § 337
Repealed. Pub. L. 89–485, § 13(g), July 1, 1966, 80 Stat. 243
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2023 · leading case: Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp., 574 F. Supp. 2d 447 (D.N.J. 2008).
Holk v. Snapple Beverage Corp., 574 F. Supp. 2d 447 (D.N.J. 2008). “12 U.S.C. § 337 (a). Instead all proceedings to enforce or “restrain violations of’ the FFDCA must be commenced *450 by the United States.”
Zyla Life Sciences, LLC. v. Wells Pharma of Houston, LLC (S.D. Tex. 2023). “2022) (holding the plaintiff's state law unfair competition claims were preempted where the basis of the claims was the defendant outsourcing facility’s alleged noncompliance with the FDCA compounding requirements); 12 U.S.C. § 337 (a). Thus, Plaintiff's claims are preempted and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.