U.S. Code » Title 12 » Chapter CHAPTER 44— TRUTH IN SAVINGS

12 U.S.C. § 4310

Repealed. Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, § 2604(a), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–470

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 12 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1995–2007 · leading case: Barnes v. Fleet Nat'l Bank, N.A., 370 F.3d 164 (1st Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barnes v. Fleet Nat'l Bank, N.A., 370 F.3d 164 (1st Cir. 2004). · cites it 9× “TISA’s private action provision, 12 U.S.C. § 4310 , imposes liability on “[a]ny depository institution which fails to comply with any requirement imposed under [TISA] or any regulation pre *171 scribed under [TISA].”
Martin Schnall, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Amboy Nat'l Bank, 279 F.3d 205 (3rd Cir. 2002). · cites it 6× “” 12 U.S.C. § 4310 (a). 2 Thus, Schnall may establish liability by showing that the Bank’s advertisements and account disclosures violated either a provision of TISA itself or a regulation promulgated pursuant to TISA.”
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney, 263 F.3d 359 (4th Cir. 2001). “§ 216 (b) (providing for “reasonable attorney’s fees ... and the costs of the action”), the Right to Financial Privacy Act, 12 U.”
Herrington v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 113 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (S.D. Miss. 2000). · cites it 3× “12 U.S.C. § 4310 (a)(1), (2)(A). Although statutory damages seem penal in nature, 2 they do not share any common characteristics with punitive damages, i.”
Cobb v. Monarch Fin. Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1164 (N.D. Ill. 1995). · cites it 2× “§ 1640 (a)(1); TISA, 12 U.S.C. § 4310 (a)(1), and in this case, actual damages could encompass the amount of interest that the defendants collected — illegally, according to Cobb — from the named plaintiff.”
Hale v. Citibank, N.A., 198 F.R.D. 606 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). · cites it 2× “See 12 U.S.C. § 4310 (a). One such regulation, 12 C.”
Hirschbach v. NVE BANK, 496 F. Supp. 2d 451 (D.N.J. 2007). “12 U.S.C. § 4310 (2000) (repealed 2001); Schnall v.”
Sanders, Michelle v. Jackson, John L., 209 F.3d 998 (7th Cir. 2000). “§ 1691e(b); Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.”
PETA v. Doughney (4th Cir. 2001). “§ 4010 (same), the Truth in Savings Act, 12 U.S.C. § 4310 (same), and other statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.