13 U.S.C. § 214

Wrongful disclosure of information

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 13 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever, being or having been an employee or staff member referred to in subchapter II of chapter 1 of this title, having taken and subscribed the oath of office, or having sworn to observe the limitations imposed by section 9 of this title, or whoever, being or having been a census liaison within the meaning of section 16 of this title, publishes or communicates any information, the disclosure of which is prohibited under the provisions of section 9 of this title, and which comes into his possession by reason of his being employed (or otherwise providing services) under the provisions of this title, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1958–2010 · leading case: United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 21 F.R.D. 568 (S.D.N.Y. 1958).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 21 F.R.D. 568 (S.D.N.Y. 1958). “13 U.S.C. § 214 . . 38 U.S.C.A. § 3201 provides that the records of the Veterans’ Administration “shall be confidential and privileged * * * except * * * when required by process of a United State court to be produced in any suit or proceeding therein pending * * *”

Census Confidentiality & the PATRIOT Act (OLC 2010). “See 13 U.S.C. § 214 . Enacted into law after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the PATRIOT Act made extensive changes to existing statutes governing investigations related to terrorism, intelligence, and national security.”

Relationship Between Illegal Immigr. Reform & Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 & Statutory Requirement for Confidentiality of Census Info. (OLC 1999). “See 13 U.S.C. § 214 (1994). The text of section 9(a) provides: (a) Neither the Secretary, nor any other officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof, or local gov- ernment census liaison, may, except as provided in section 8 or 16 or chapter 10…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.