15 U.S.C. § 1223
Limitations
Any action brought pursuant to this chapter shall be forever barred unless commenced within three years after the cause of action shall have accrued.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1959–2019 · leading case: Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2013).
Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, 732 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2013). “1125 (1956), codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1223 (“Any action brought pursuant to this Act shall be forever barred unless commenced within three years after the cause of action shall have accrued.”
United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 135 S. Ct. 1625 (2015). “1125 , 15 U. S. C. §1223 (1958 ed.); §111(b) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, 80 Stat.”
Bronx Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 212 F. Supp. 2d 233 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “) However, the Court also concluded that Paladino properly stated a claim for relief against Chrysler under ADDCA to the extent that (1) the claim may have accrued after July 22, 1995, and therefore within the three-year ADDCA statute of limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 1223 ; and (2)…”
United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 575 U.S. 402 (2015). “1125 , 15 U. S. C. §1223 (1958 ed.); §111(b) of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, 80 Stat.”
Evanston Motor Co., Inc. v. Mid-S. Toyota Distributors, Inc., 436 F. Supp. 1370 (N.D. Ill. 1977). “The other defendants also ask for dismissal from Count IV, asserting that the three year statute of limitations applicable to the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1223 , bars plaintiff’s claim.”
Volkswagen Interamericana, S.A. v. Henry Rohlsen, 360 F.2d 437 (1st Cir. 1966). “Even if it be assumed that defendant acted unreasonably and coercively, not only did none of these events occur within the three-year statutory period before the action was commenced, 15 U.”
Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 380 F. Supp. 819 (M.D. Tenn. 1974). “15 U.S.C. § 1223 . 55 . See p. 835, supra.”
Empire Volkswagen, Inc. v. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp., 95 F.R.D. 398 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). “The applicable statute of limitations, 15 U.S.C. § 1223 , is three years and would therefore bar any statutory claims prior to September 1977.”
Rea v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F. Supp. 842 (W.D. Pa. 1973). “This cancellation was the result of threats of Ford representatives made during the period March 1, 1964 to August 31,1964 (Tr.”
Pinney & Topliff v. Chrysler Corp., 176 F. Supp. 801 (S.D. Cal. 1959). “15 U.S.C.A. § 1223 . 28 . California Civil Code, § 3515.”
Pearson v. Ford Motor Co., 865 F. Supp. 1504 (N.D. Fla. 1994). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1223 . Pearson filed the original complaint in this action on January 25, 1993.”
Hugh Chalmers Motors, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S. A., Inc. Gulf States Toyota, Inc., 184 F.3d 761 (8th Cir. 1999). “Nonetheless, appellant contends that it should be able to bring suit for alleged violations occurring within the three-year statute of limitations stated in 15 U.S.C. § 1223 -i.e., alleged violations of ADDICA occurring after April 1993, the date the state court action was filed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.