15 U.S.C. § 1536
Prohibition against fraudulent use of “Made in America” labels
If it has been finally determined by a court or a Federal agency that any person intentionally affixed a label bearing a “Made in America” inscription, or an inscription with the same meaning, to any product sold in or shipped to the United States that is not made in the United States, that person shall be ineligible to receive any contract or subcontract from the Department of Commerce, pursuant to the debarment, suspension, and ineligibility procedures in subpart 9.4 of chapter 1 of title 48, Code of Federal Regulations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 333 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 333 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2003). “15 U.S.C. § 1536 (b) (2000). The consultation may extend beyond 150 days only with the applicant’s consent.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 524 F.3d 917 (9th Cir. 2008). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(2). The ESA imposes a procedural consultation duty whenever a federal action may affect an ESA-listed species.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 422 F.3d 782 (9th Cir. 2005). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(2). To ensure that the agency would meet its substantive ESA duties, the ESA imposes a procedural consultation duty whenever a federal action may affect an ESA-listed species.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council v. Kempthorne, 506 F. Supp. 2d 322 (E.D. Cal. 2007). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(2). The ESA imposes a procedural consultation duty whenever a federal action may affect an ESA-listed species.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 254 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Or. 2003). “Pursuant to section 7(b)(3)(A) of the ESA, 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (b)(3)(A), and 50 C.F.R.”
Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Associations v. Gutierrez, 606 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (E.D. Cal. 2008). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(2). The ESA imposes a procedural consultation duty whenever a federal action may affect an ESA-listed species.”
Smith v. Encore Credit Corp., 623 F. Supp. 2d 910 (N.D. Ohio 2008). “, 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (f). For all these reasons, Counts I and III are barred by the statute of limitations.”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 481 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2007). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(2). The ESA imposes a procedural consultation duty whenever a federal action may affect an ESA-listed species.”
Pac. Rivers Council v. Robertson, 854 F. Supp. 713 (D. Or. 1993). “15 U.S.C. § 1536 (b); Thomas v. Peterson, 753 F.”
Forest Guardians v. Veneman, 392 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. Ariz. 2005). “§ 1536 (a)(l)(“The Secretary shall review other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in furtherance of [the ESA], All other Federal agencies shall, in consultation with and with the assistance of the Secretary, utilize their authorities in furtherance of the…”
Env't Prot. Info. Ctr., Inc. v. Pac. Lumber Co., 67 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (N.D. Cal. 1999). “15 U.S.C. § 1536 (a)(1) (emphasis added).”
Sierra Club v. United States Forest Serv., 593 F. Supp. 2d 1306 (N.D. Ga. 2008). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1536 (c). (Emphasis added). The Forest Service cannot limit its biological evaluation to those listed species which are found in the project area or those which have "high potential” to exist there.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.