15 U.S.C. § 1661

Catalogs and multiple-page advertisements

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purposes of this part, a catalog or other multiple-page advertisement shall be considered a single advertisement if it clearly and conspicuously displays a credit terms table on which the information required to be stated under this part is clearly set forth.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Johnson v. Citibank, N.A., 63 F. Supp. 3d 545 (D. Maryland 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Johnson v. Citibank, N.A., 63 F. Supp. 3d 545 (D. Maryland 2014). · cites it 2× “Johnson misidentified the relevant FCBA provision as 15 U.S.C. § 1661 , but it is clear that the claims he sets forth arise under § 1666 and I will construe his pleadings accordingly.”

Carrasco v. M&T Bank (D. Maryland 2021). “” 15 U.S.C. § 1661 -1665e. TILA’s civil liability provision in Section 1640(a) states: “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, any creditor who fails to comply with any requirement imposed under this part [part B], including any requirement under section 1635 of this…”

Lacy v. Mortg. Elec. Registrations Sys., Inc. (E.D. Pa. 2024). “, the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1661 et seq., and its Regulation Z, 12 C.”

Morris v. Synchrony Bank (E.D. Va. 2025). “In its discussion, of the FCBA, the only statutory provision that Defendant identifies is 15 U.S.C. § 1661 , e¢ seq., which is ot part of the FCBA.”

Ladoux (D.N.J. 2026). “12), and Chase replied (ECF No. 13). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides this matter without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78 and Local Civil Rule 78.”

Fid. Mortg. Corp. v. Seattle Times Co., 304 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (W.D. Wash. 2004). “§§ 1631-1649 ), while credit advertising is addressed in part C ( 15 U.S.C. §§ 1661 -1665b). 2 . Having found that plaintiff lacks standing under the TILA, it is not necessary for the Court to reach the question whether Seattle Times is a “creditor” or “lessor” required to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.