U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 42— INTERSTATE LAND SALES

15 U.S.C. § 1716

Unlawful representations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

The fact that a statement of record with respect to a subdivision has been filed or is in effect shall not be deemed a finding by the Director that the statement of record is true and accurate on its face, or be held to mean the Director has in any way passed upon the merits of, or given approval to, such subdivision. It shall be unlawful to make, or cause to be made, to any prospective purchaser any representation contrary to the foregoing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1976–1985 · leading case: Husted v. Amrep Corp., 429 F. Supp. 298 (S.D.N.Y. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Husted v. Amrep Corp., 429 F. Supp. 298 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. § 1716 . Developers are also required to prepare a “property report” containing any information in the statement of record, or any other information, which the Secretary “may by rules or regulation require as being necessary or appropriate in the public interest or…”
Colorado Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. Hills, 420 F. Supp. 582 (D. Colo. 1976). “” § 1417 of the Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1716 . Moreover, the Act prohibits any person from advertising or representing that the Secretary approves or recommends the subdivision or the sale or lease of lots therein.”
Jonak v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins., 629 F. Supp. 90 (D. Neb. 1985). “…to 134, dealing with trademarks, were repealed in 1946 and their provisions assigned to other portions of Title 15) 15 U.S.C. §§ 1716 , 1719 (parts of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act; § 1716 prohibits misrepresentations to prospective purchasers of lots in…”
Colo. Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. Hills, 420 F. Supp. 582 (D. Colo. 1976). “" § 1417 of the Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1716 . Moreover, the Act prohibits any person from advertising or representing that the Secretary approves or recommends the subdivision or the sale or lease of lots therein.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.