U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 42— INTERSTATE LAND SALES

15 U.S.C. § 1717

Penalties for violations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person who willfully violates any of the provisions of this chapter, or the rules and regulations prescribed pursuant thereto, or any person who willfully, in a statement of record filed under, or in a property report issued pursuant to, this chapter, makes any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any material fact required to be stated therein, shall upon conviction be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1973–2010 · leading case: United States v. Daryls Foster Steed, 674 F.2d 284 (4th Cir. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Daryls Foster Steed, 674 F.2d 284 (4th Cir. 1982). · cites it 4× “5 Ill The jury found Steed guilty of furnishing a false statement to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in violation of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1717 . 6 She. also was found guilty of mail fraud for causing the false statement…”
United States v. Robert v. Steinhilber, 484 F.2d 386 (8th Cir. 1973). · cites it 3× “Steinhilber appeals his conviction, by a jury, of violating the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1717 . The indictment alleged that Steinhilber knowingly and willfully made untrue statements of a material fact in a “Statement of Record” filed with the Department of Housing and Urban…”
United States v. Norman Lester Dacus, Nevada Land Builders, Inc., Green Saddle Ranch Co., 634 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1980). “Steinhilber dealt with a conviction under a different statute, 15 U.S.C. § 1717 , for willfully making untrue statements or omissions of material fact.”
United States v. Daryls Foster Steed, 646 F.2d 136 (4th Cir. 1981). “§ 1341 , and two counts of furnishing false statements to the Department of Housing and Urban Development in violation of the Interstate Land Sales Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1717 . At the close of the Government’s case, Steed moved under Fed.”
Taplett v. TRG Oasis (Tower Two), Ltd., L.P., 755 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (M.D. Fla. 2009). “§ 1714 , or criminal prosecutions, 15 U.S.C. § 1717 , is another matter. 7 .”
United States v. Watts, 72 F. Supp. 2d 106 (E.D.N.Y. 1999). · cites it 2× “Finally, the Eighth Circuit has also held the Bronston defense available in a prose *117 cution for false statements to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1717 . See United States v. Steinhilber, 484 F.”
In re Anonymous No. 18 D.B. 78, 14 Pa. D. & C.3d 759 (Pa. 1980). “598 , 15 U.S.C.A. §1717 (making material untrue statements in property reports filed with HUD pursuant to the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act); six counts of violating the Act of August 1, 1968, 82 Stat.”
United States v. Amrep Corp., 425 F. Supp. 460 (S.D.N.Y. 1976). “The Interstate Land Sales Act provides a maximum punishment of five years’ imprisonment and a $5,000 fine ( 15 U.S.C. § 1717 ). The defendants were arraigned on November 10, 1975, and at a pretrial conference held on November 18, 1975, the court inquired as to why it was…”
Venezia v. 12th & Div. Props., LLC, 685 F. Supp. 2d 752 (M.D. Tenn. 2010). “15 U.S.C. § 1717 . 3 . The Court notes that the omission in fact does not constitute a violation of § 1703(a)(1).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.