15 U.S.C. § 2057e

Banning of crib bumpers

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general

Not later than 180 days after May 16, 2022, crib bumpers, regardless of the date of manufacture, shall be considered a banned hazardous product under section 2057 of this title.

(b) Crib bumper definedIn this section, the term “crib bumper”—(1) means any material that is intended to cover the sides of a crib to prevent injury to any crib occupant from impacts against the side of a crib or to prevent partial or complete access to any openings in the sides of a crib to prevent a crib occupant from getting any part of the body entrapped in any opening;(2) includes a padded crib bumper, a supported and unsupported vinyl bumper guard, and vertical crib slat covers; and(3) does not include a non-padded mesh crib liner.(Pub. L. 117–126, § 3, May 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1208.)Editorial NotesCodification

Section was enacted as part of the Safe Sleep for Babies Act of 2021, and not as part of the Consumer Product Safety Act which comprises this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, 597 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, 597 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). · cites it 2× “The Statutory Context Is Consistent With the Plain Language of the Phthalate Prohibitions The Commission argues that Congress did expressly create an exception for existing inventory by providing— in Section 108(d), a different provision of the CPSIA (15 U.S.C. § 2057e(d)) —…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 2057e(d) — 1 case
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, 597 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). “The Statutory Context Is Consistent With the Plain Language of the Phthalate Prohibitions The Commission argues that Congress did expressly create an exception for existing inventory by providing— in Section 108(d), a different provision of the CPSIA (15 U.S.C. § 2057e(d)) —…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.