15 U.S.C. § 2689
Prohibited acts
It shall be unlawful for any person to fail or refuse to comply with a provision of this subchapter or with any rule or order issued under this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2000–2015 · leading case: Sipes Ex Rel. Slaughter v. Russell, 89 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Kan. 2000).
Sipes Ex Rel. Slaughter v. Russell, 89 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Kan. 2000). “, the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. § 2689 , and negligence. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction And For Failure To State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (Doc.”
Vidiksis v. Env't Prot. Agency, 612 F.3d 1150 (11th Cir. 2010). “The complaint alleged 69 violations of the Toxic Substances Control Act section 409, 15 U.S.C. § 2689 ; the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, 42 U.”
Cudjoe v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 426 F.3d 241 (3rd Cir. 2005). “(5) Prohibited act It shall be a prohibited act under section 409 of the Toxic Substances Control Act [ 15 U.S.C. § 2689 ] for any person to fail or refuse to comply with a provision of this section or with any rule or order issued under this section.”
United States v. Michael Moshe Shimshoni, 631 F. App'x 788 (11th Cir. 2015). “§ 4852d(b)(5), further provides that a violation of any EPA rale issued under the Lead Hazard Act constitutes a “prohibited act” under the Toxic Substances Act as codified at 15 U.S.C. § 2689 . See 42 U.S.C. § 4852d(b)(5).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.