15 U.S.C. § 27
Effect of partial invalidity
If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Act shall, for any reason, be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1952–1983 · leading case: Miller v. Indiana Hosp., 562 F. Supp. 1259 (W.D. Pa. 1983).
Miller v. Indiana Hosp., 562 F. Supp. 1259 (W.D. Pa. 1983). “Furthermore, it is not clear how § 26 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 27 (“Effect of Partial Invalidity”) provides a basis for relief.”
Iranian Shipping Lines, S.A. v. Moraites, 377 F. Supp. 644 (S.D.N.Y. 1974). “Since there is no question of subject-matter jurisdiction over the antitrust claims or of service of process under 15 U.S.C. § 27 , I confirm the report of the Special Master and hold that, in the cir *649 cumstances of this multiple defendant action, there is proper venue in…”
Sakis v. United States, 103 F. Supp. 292 (D.D.C. 1952). “The fact that the contract rights are held against a corporation in the terms of corporate securities is of no consequence, as has been established in cases decided under the Public Utility Holding Company Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 27 . As the Court said in American Power & Light Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.