15 U.S.C. § 278n

Repealed. Pub. L. 114–329, title II, § 205(a)(1), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 3000

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Wanda Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
Wanda Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “15 U.S.C. § 278n; 15 C.F.R. Part 295. 3 The ATP program accepts grant proposals only from businesses (or joint ventures involving a business), and submits those proposals to technical and business experts who review them to determine whether the project has “the potential for…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 278n(d)(10) — 1 case
Wanda Henke v. United States Dep't of Com. & Nat'l Sci. Found., 83 F.3d 1453 (D.C. Cir. 1996). “15 U.S.C. § 278n; 15 C.F.R. Part 295. 3 The ATP program accepts grant proposals only from businesses (or joint ventures involving a business), and submits those proposals to technical and business experts who review them to determine whether the project has “the potential for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.