U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 1— MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE

15 U.S.C. § 27a

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2001 · leading case: Major League Baseball v. Butterworth, 181 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (N.D. Fla. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Major League Baseball v. Butterworth, 181 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (N.D. Fla. 2001). · cites it 3× “See 15 U.S.C. § 27a. It was the reserve system that was specifically challenged in Flood .”
Morsani v. Major League Baseball, 79 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 1999). “” 15 U.S.C. § 27a(b)(3). See generally Ted Curtis, The Flood Act’s Place in Baseball Legal History, 9 Marq.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 27a(b) — 1 case
Major League Baseball v. Butterworth, 181 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (N.D. Fla. 2001). “See 15 U.S.C. § 27a. It was the reserve system that was specifically challenged in Flood .”
— 15 U.S.C. § 27a(b)(3) — 1 case
Morsani v. Major League Baseball, 79 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 1999). “” 15 U.S.C. § 27a(b)(3). See generally Ted Curtis, The Flood Act’s Place in Baseball Legal History, 9 Marq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.