15 U.S.C. § 282

Repealed. Pub. L. 100–418, title V, § 5113, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1432

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Rohm & Haas Co. v. Dawson Chem. Co., Inc., 557 F. Supp. 739 (S.D. Tex. 1983).
Rohm & Haas Co. v. Dawson Chem. Co., Inc., 557 F. Supp. 739 (S.D. Tex. 1983). “Each of the listed and claimed patents and publications was cited by Rohm and Haas or raised during the initial and renewed prosecutions of Rohm and Haas’ patent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.