U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 55— PETROLEUM MARKETING PRACTICES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— OCTANE DISCLOSURE

15 U.S.C. § 2824

Relationship of statutory provisions to State and local laws

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) To the extent that any provision of this subchapter applies to any act or omission, no State or any political subdivision thereof may adopt or continue in effect, except as provided in subsection (b), any provision of law or regulation with respect to such act or omission, unless such provision of such law or regulation is the same as the applicable provision of this subchapter.(b) A State or political subdivision thereof may provide for any investigative or enforcement action, remedy, or penalty (including procedural actions necessary to carry out such investigative or enforcement actions, remedies, or penalties) with respect to any provision of law or regulation permitted by subsection (a).(Pub. L. 95–297, title II, § 204, June 19, 1978, 92 Stat. 337; Pub. L. 102–486, title XV, § 1502(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2997.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–486 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: “To the extent that any provision of this subchapter applies to any act or omission, no State or any political subdivision thereof may adopt, enforce, or continue in effect any provision of any law or regulation (including any remedy or penalty applicable to any violation thereof) with respect to such act or omission, unless such provision of such law or regulation is the same as the applicable provision of this subchapter.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1998–2019 · leading case: Joyce Johnson v. MFA Petroleum Co., 701 F.3d 243 (8th Cir. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Joyce Johnson v. MFA Petroleum Co., 701 F.3d 243 (8th Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “§ 2806 (a)(1) with 15 U.S.C. § 2824 . Johnson points out significant differences within the federal statute: Subchapter I specifically creates a federal cause of action, 15 U.”
VP Racing Fuels, Inc. v. Gen. Petroleum Corp., 673 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (E.D. Cal. 2009). · cites it 5× “15 U.S.C. § 2824 (1988), amended by 15 U.”
Alvarez v. Chevron Corp., 656 F.3d 925 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. § 2824 (a) (emphasis added). The Posting Rule incorporates this preemption provision.”
Johnson v. MFA Petroleum Co., 10 F. Supp. 3d 982 (W.D. Mo. 2014). · cites it 7× “15 U.S.C. § 2824 (a). In relevant part, this provision states: (a) To the extent that any provision of this subchapter applies to any action or omission, no State or any political subdivision thereof may adopt or continue in effect, except as provided in subsection (b) of this…”
Jurman v. Sun Co., 248 A.D.2d 246 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998). “We agree that plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, Octane Disclosure ( 15 USC §§ 2821-2824 ) in that the preemption clause ( 15 USC § 2824 [a]) bans any State “provision of law or regulation” that is not the same as the Federal provisions…”
M.O. Dion & Sons, Inc. v. VP Racing Fuels, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2019). “” 15 U.S.C. § 2824 (a) (emphasis ______________________________________________________________________________ CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.