U.S. Code
»
Title 15
» Chapter CHAPTER 66— PROMOTION OF EXPORT TRADE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— EXPORT TRADE CERTIFICATES OF REVIEW
15 U.S.C. § 4015
Judicial review; admissibility
(a) District court review of grants or denials; erroneous determinationIf the Secretary grants or denies, in whole or in part, an application for a certificate of review or for an amendment to a certificate, or revokes or modifies a certificate pursuant to section 4014(b) of this title, any person aggrieved by such determination may, within 30 days of the determination, bring an action in any appropriate district court of the United States to set aside the determination on the ground that such determination is erroneous.
(b) Exclusive provision for reviewExcept as provided in subsection (a), no action by the Secretary or the Attorney General pursuant to this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review.
(c) Inadmissibility in antitrust proceedingsIf the Secretary denies, in whole or in part, an application for a certificate of review or for an amendment to a certificate, or revokes or amends a certificate, neither the negative determination nor the statement of reasons therefor shall be admissible in evidence, in any administrative or judicial proceeding, in support of any claim under the antitrust laws.
(Pub. L. 97–290, title III, § 305, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1243.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective DateSection effective Oct. 8, 1982, see section 312 of Pub. L. 97–290, set out as a note under section 4011 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Horizons Int'l, Inc. v. Baldridge, 624 F. Supp. 1560 (E.D. Pa. 1986).
· cites it 3× “15 U.S.C.A. § 4015 (a)-(b). Defendants contend that subsection (b) limits judicial review to the scope of subsection (a).”
Horizons Int'l, Inc. v. Baldrige, 811 F.2d 154 (3rd Cir. 1987).
· cites it 4× “” 15 U.S.C. § 4015 (a). In the instant case, the Secretary issued such a certificate to Chlor/Alkali Producers International (Chlor/Alkali), a joint venture comprising four major domestic manufacturers of caustic soda and chlorine.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.