U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 89— PROFESSIONAL BOXING SAFETY

15 U.S.C. § 6307e

Required disclosures for promoters

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Disclosures to the boxing commissionsA promoter shall not be entitled to receive any compensation directly or indirectly in connection with a boxing match until it provides to the boxing commission responsible for regulating the match in a State a statement of—(1) a copy of any agreement in writing to which the promoter is a party with any boxer participating in the match;(2) a statement made under penalty of perjury that there are no other agreements, written or oral, between the promoter and the boxer with respect to that match; and(3)(A) all fees, charges, and expenses that will be assessed by or through the promoter on the boxer pertaining to the event, including any portion of the boxer’s purse that the promoter will receive, and training expenses;(B) all payments, gifts, or benefits the promoter is providing to any sanctioning organization affiliated with the event; and(C) any reduction in a boxer’s purse contrary to a previous agreement between the promoter and the boxer or a purse bid held for the event.(b) Disclosures to the boxerA promoter shall not be entitled to receive any compensation directly or indirectly in connection with a boxing match until it provides to the boxer it promotes—(1) the amounts of any compensation or consideration that a promoter has contracted to receive from such match;(2) all fees, charges, and expenses that will be assessed by or through the promoter on the boxer pertaining to the event, including any portion of the boxer’s purse that the promoter will receive, and training expenses; and(3) any reduction in a boxer’s purse contrary to a previous agreement between the promoter and the boxer or a purse bid held for the event.(c) Information to be available to State Attorney General

A promoter shall make information required to be disclosed under this section available to the chief law enforcement officer of the State in which the match is to be held upon request of such officer.

(Pub. L. 104–272, § 13, as added Pub. L. 106–210, § 4(2), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 324.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 13 of Pub. L. 104–272 was renumbered section 21 and is classified to section 6312 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: Classic Ent. & Sports, Inc. v. Pemberton, 988 A.2d 847 (R.I. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Classic Ent. & Sports, Inc. v. Pemberton, 988 A.2d 847 (R.I. 2010). “We also note that, in his supplemental statement to this Court and at oral argument, defendant made several arguments regarding an arbitration clause in the original promotional contract and the applicability of the federal Professional Boxing Safety statute (commonly referred…”
Main Events Prods., LLC v. Lacy, 358 F. Supp. 2d 391 (D.N.J. 2004). · cites it 3× “Therefore, the first issue with respect to the disclosure requirements is whether the disclosure provision, 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b), is satisfied by giving the disclosure to the boxer’s manager rather than directly to the boxer himself.”
Franklin v. Haak (E.D. Mich. 2020). · cites it 4× “15 U.S.C. §6307e(b) addresses required disclosures by a promoter.”
Gomez v. New Champion Promotions, LLC (N.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 3× “§ 6308 , SAC ¶¶ 66–77; (2) violation of the disclosure 4 requirement of the Ali Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b), SAC ¶¶ 78–86; (3) violation of California state 5 licensing law for boxing managers, Cal.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b) — 3 cases
Main Events Prods., LLC v. Lacy, 358 F. Supp. 2d 391 (D.N.J. 2004). “Therefore, the first issue with respect to the disclosure requirements is whether the disclosure provision, 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b), is satisfied by giving the disclosure to the boxer’s manager rather than directly to the boxer himself.”
Franklin v. Haak (E.D. Mich. 2020). “15 U.S.C. §6307e(b) addresses required disclosures by a promoter.”
Gomez v. New Champion Promotions, LLC (N.D. Cal. 2024). “§ 6308 , SAC ¶¶ 66–77; (2) violation of the disclosure 4 requirement of the Ali Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b), SAC ¶¶ 78–86; (3) violation of California state 5 licensing law for boxing managers, Cal.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b)(2) — 1 case
Gomez v. New Champion Promotions, LLC (N.D. Cal. 2024). “§ 6308 , SAC ¶¶ 66–77; (2) violation of the disclosure 4 requirement of the Ali Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6307e(b), SAC ¶¶ 78–86; (3) violation of California state 5 licensing law for boxing managers, Cal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.