15 U.S.C. § 637b

Availability of information

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Requests for informationFor any contract to be let by any Federal agency, such agency shall provide to any small business concern upon its request—(1) a copy of bid sets and specifications with respect to such contract;(2) the name and telephone number of an employee of such agency to answer questions with respect to such contract; and(3) adequate citations to each major Federal law or agency rule with which such business concern must comply in performing such contract.(b) Exempt contractsSubsection (a) shall not apply to any contract or subcontract under such contract which—(1) will be performed entirely outside any State, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; or(2) is for services which are personal in nature.(Pub. L. 95–507, title II, § 223, Oct. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 1772.)Editorial NotesCodification

Section was not enacted as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1990 · leading case: Ceccanti, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 526 (Ct. Cl. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Ceccanti, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 526 (Ct. Cl. 1984). · cites it 2× “* The plaintiff claims that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 637b(a)(2) (1982) the defendant, through Robertson, had an implied duty to disclose fully, truthfully, and accurately any information relevant to the contract, and that the plaintiff had an implied right to rely on that…”

Colonial Trading Corp. v. Dep't of the Navy, 735 F. Supp. 429 (D.D.C. 1990). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. § 637b. The March 2, 1987 and July 27, 1988 requirements synopsized in the Commerce Business Daily were for entire torpedoes.”

— 15 U.S.C. § 637b(a)(2) — 1 case

Ceccanti, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 526 (Ct. Cl. 1984). “* The plaintiff claims that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 637b(a)(2) (1982) the defendant, through Robertson, had an implied duty to disclose fully, truthfully, and accurately any information relevant to the contract, and that the plaintiff had an implied right to rely on that…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.