15 U.S.C. § 70f

Injunction proceedings

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever the Commission has reason to believe—(a) that any person is doing, or is about to do, an act which by section 70a, 70c, 70d, 70g, or 70h(b) of this title is declared to be unlawful; and(b) that it would be to the public interest to enjoin the doing of such act until complaint is issued by the Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] and such complaint is dismissed by the Commission or set aside by the court on review or until an order to cease and desist made thereon by the Commission has become final within the meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act,the Commission may bring suit in the district court of the United States or in the United States court of any Territory, for the district or Territory in which such person resides or transacts business, to enjoin the doing of such act and upon proper showing a temporary injunction or restraining order shall be granted without bond.(Pub. L. 85–897, § 8, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1721.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in text, is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§ 41 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1966–1968 · leading case: Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597 (1966).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597 (1966). · cites it 2× “); and § 8 of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, 15 U. S. C. § 70f (1964 ed.). [6] See Elman, Rulemaking Procedures in the FTC's Enforcement of the Merger Law, 78 Harv.”

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Guignon, 390 F.2d 323 (8th Cir. 1968). “§ 1195 (a) (1964); and Section 8 of the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, 15 U.S.C. § 70f (1964). Thus, affirmance would do little to center responsibility for FTC litigation in the Office of the Attorney General, but would do much to limit the role of the FTC as a…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.