15 U.S.C. § 77bb
“Corporation of Foreign Security Holders”; creation; principal office; branch offices
For the purpose of protecting, conserving, and advancing the interests of the holders of foreign securities in default, there is hereby created a body corporate with the name “Corporation of Foreign Security Holders” (herein called the “Corporation”). The principal office of the Corporation shall be located in the District of Columbia, but there may be established agencies or branch offices in any city or cities of the United States under rules and regulations prescribed by the board of directors.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1986–2019 · leading case: MDCM Holdings, Inc. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., 216 F. Supp. 2d 251 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
MDCM Holdings, Inc. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., 216 F. Supp. 2d 251 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “15 U.S.C. § 77bb(£)(l). SLUSA thus provides for federal preemption of any claim that meets four prerequisites.”
Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A., 581 F.3d 305 (6th Cir. 2009). “alleging — an untrue statement or omission of a material fact .”
Baum v. Phillips, Appel & Walden, Inc., 648 F. Supp. 1518 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “See 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(a); Phillips v. Kapp, 87 F.”
Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2002). “15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(5)(B) (emphasis added).”
Northstar Fin. Advisors Inc. v. Schwab Investments, 135 F. Supp. 3d 1059 (N.D. Cal. 2015). “”-15 U.S.C. § 77bb. With respect to the other SLUSA requirements, Northstar does not dispute that the instant action constitutes a covered class action, that Shares in the'Fund are covered securities, that Plaintiff’s claims are based entirely on the comihon or statutory law of…”
Portell v. Zayed, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1025 (E.D. Ill. 2019). “§ 77p(b) - (c) ; see also 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1)-(2). In 1995, Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ("PSLRA"), 15 U.”
Magyery v. Transamerica Fin. Advisors, Inc., 315 F. Supp. 2d 954 (N.D. Ind. 2004). “SLUSA provides: No covered class action based upon the statutory or common law of any State or subdivision thereof may be maintained in any State or Federal court by any private party alleging— (A) a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the…”
Horvath v. Zayed a/k/a Dean Zayed (N.D. Ill. 2019). “§ 77p(b)– (c); see also 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1)-(2). In 1995, Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”), 15 U.”
Daniel Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A. (6th Cir. 2009). “§ 77p(b); accord 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1). Add to this the Supreme Court’s admonition that SLUSA’s prohibitions must be “broad[ly]” construed, Dabit, 547 U.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(a) — 1 case
Baum v. Phillips, Appel & Walden, Inc., 648 F. Supp. 1518 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “See 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(a); Phillips v. Kapp, 87 F.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1) — 3 cases
Portell v. Zayed, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1025 (E.D. Ill. 2019). “§ 77p(b) - (c) ; see also 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1)-(2). In 1995, Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act ("PSLRA"), 15 U.”
Horvath v. Zayed a/k/a Dean Zayed (N.D. Ill. 2019). “§ 77p(b)– (c); see also 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1)-(2). In 1995, Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”), 15 U.”
Daniel Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A. (6th Cir. 2009). “§ 77p(b); accord 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(1). Add to this the Supreme Court’s admonition that SLUSA’s prohibitions must be “broad[ly]” construed, Dabit, 547 U.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(5)(B) — 1 case
Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (N.D. Cal. 2002). “15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(5)(B) (emphasis added).”
— 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(l) — 2 cases
Segal v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A., 581 F.3d 305 (6th Cir. 2009). “alleging — an untrue statement or omission of a material fact .”
MDCM Holdings, Inc. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., 216 F. Supp. 2d 251 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “15 U.S.C. § 77bb(£)(l). SLUSA thus provides for federal preemption of any claim that meets four prerequisites.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 77bb(f)(l)(A) — 1 case
Magyery v. Transamerica Fin. Advisors, Inc., 315 F. Supp. 2d 954 (N.D. Ind. 2004). “SLUSA provides: No covered class action based upon the statutory or common law of any State or subdivision thereof may be maintained in any State or Federal court by any private party alleging— (A) a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.