U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 2A— SECURITIES AND TRUST INDENTURES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— TRUST INDENTURES

15 U.S.C. § 77vvv

Judicial review

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Review of orders

Orders of the Commission under this subchapter (including orders pursuant to the provisions of sections 77eee(b) and 77ggg(c) of this title) shall be subject to review in the same manner, upon the same conditions, and to the same extent, as provided in section 9 of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. 77i], with respect to orders of the Commission under such Act.

(b) Jurisdiction of offenses and suits

Jurisdiction of offenses and violations under, and jurisdiction and venue of suits and actions brought to enforce any liability or duty created by, this subchapter, or any rules or regulations or orders prescribed under the authority thereof, shall be as provided in section 22(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. 77v(a)].

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title III, § 322, as added Aug. 3, 1939, ch. 411, 53 Stat. 1175; amended Pub. L. 101–550, title IV, § 418, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2732.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Such Act, referred to in subsec. (a), means the Securities Act of 1933, approved May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, 48 Stat. 74, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§ 77a et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 77a of this title and Tables.

Amendments

1990—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–550 inserted “or duty” after “any liability”.

Executive DocumentsTransfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§ 1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1942–2016 · leading case: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning, 136 S. Ct. 1562 (2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning, 136 S. Ct. 1562 (2016). “3 See Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77v(a) ; Federal Power Act of 1935, 16 U.”
In Re Equity Funding Corp. of Am. Sec. Litig., 416 F. Supp. 161 (C.D. Cal. 1976). · cites it 2× “This claim provides a basis for federal jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv. Ibid., at 822. FNCB’s motion to dismiss the Count IX claims made against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is, therefore, denied, although the Count IX plaintiffs will be limited to…”
Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 316 U.S. 4 (1942). “1175 , 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv; Public Utility Act of 1935, 49 Stat.”
Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, & as Sec'y of the Dep't of Educ., 711 F.2d 161 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77vvv(a), 78y(a)(l), 80a-42(a), 80b-13(a) (1976) (Securities & Exchange Comm’n orders); id.”
Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New York, 406 U.S. 416 (1972). “If there is a cause of action, 15 U. S. C. § 77vvv would seem to give federal courts jurisdiction.”
Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co., 473 F. Supp. 201 (E.D. Pa. 1979). · cites it 3× “On September 29, 1978, plaintiff Jay Zeffiro (“Zeffiro”) filed a class action complaint against First Pennsylvania, alleging jurisdiction under § 322 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv(b), which incorporates by reference the concurrent jurisdictional section of the Securities Act of…”
Oxford First Corp. v. PNC Liquidating Corp., 372 F. Supp. 191 (E.D. Pa. 1974). “§ 78aa (1970) ; Trust Indenture Act of 1939 § 322(b), 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv (1970). The other three acts follow the same formula, with the additional choice of any district where the defendant “transacts business.”
J. John Brouk, James J. Mullen, Jr., W. Munro Roberts, Jr. v. Managed Funds, Inc., 286 F.2d 901 (8th Cir. 1961). “§ 79y, and the Trust Indenture Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77vvv, are substantially the same as 80a-43.”
Morris v. Cantor, 390 F. Supp. 817 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). · cites it 2× “This Court’s jurisdiction of the controversy between plaintiffs and the Bank is based exclusively upon the Trust Indenture Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv, which provides: “Jurisdiction of offenses and violations under, and jurisdiction and venue of suits and actions brought to enforce…”
Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A., 574 F. Supp. 443 (E.D. Pa. 1983). “This class action suit arises under The Trust Indenture Act of 1939, 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv, and state law. After extensive litigation, see e.”
Sullivan v. Chase Inv. Servs. of Boston, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 171 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “See Trust Indenture Act of 1939, 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv(b). 14 . Even without a specific grant of jurisdiction, federal district courts would have jurisdiction over this action because it “arises under” a law of the United States and involves more than $10,000.”
Schmidt v. Enertec Corp., 598 F. Supp. 1528 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “Jurisdiction is alleged under § 322 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“Trust Indenture Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv, § 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv(a) — 1 case
Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, & as Sec'y of the Dep't of Educ., 711 F.2d 161 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77vvv(a), 78y(a)(l), 80a-42(a), 80b-13(a) (1976) (Securities & Exchange Comm’n orders); id.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv(b) — 4 cases
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Manning, 136 S. Ct. 1562 (2016). “3 See Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77v(a) ; Federal Power Act of 1935, 16 U.”
Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co., 473 F. Supp. 201 (E.D. Pa. 1979). “On September 29, 1978, plaintiff Jay Zeffiro (“Zeffiro”) filed a class action complaint against First Pennsylvania, alleging jurisdiction under § 322 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv(b), which incorporates by reference the concurrent jurisdictional section of the Securities Act of…”
Sullivan v. Chase Inv. Servs. of Boston, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 171 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “See Trust Indenture Act of 1939, 15 U.S.C. § 77vvv(b). 14 . Even without a specific grant of jurisdiction, federal district courts would have jurisdiction over this action because it “arises under” a law of the United States and involves more than $10,000.”
Hunter v. S. Indem. Underwriters, Inc., 47 F. Supp. 242 (E.D. Ky. 1942).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.