15 U.S.C. § 78aaa
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 327
cases (24 in the last 5 years), 1971–2026 · leading case: Fairfield Sentry Ltd. v. Theodoor GGC Amsterdam (In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.), 596 B.R. 275 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018).
Fairfield Sentry Ltd. v. Theodoor GGC Amsterdam (In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.), 596 B.R. 275 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018). “In December 2008, however, Madoff admitted to operating the investment advisory business of BLMIS as a Ponzi scheme, and BLMIS was placed into a liquidation proceeding pursuant to section 78eee of the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa, et seq. In hindsight,…”
Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, 442 U.S. 560 (1979). “1636 , 15 U. S. C. § 78aaa et seq. [5] The District Court *565 granted the requested decree and appointed respondent Redington (Trustee) to act as trustee in the liquidation of the Weis business under SIPA.”
Clarke v. Sec. Indus. Assn., 479 U.S. 388 (1987). “See the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U. S. C. § 78aaa et seq. (restricting advertising, promotional, and selling practices of brokers regarding interest-bearing free credit balances); 17 CFR § 240 .”
Sec. Inv. Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 594 B.R. 167 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018). “Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("BLMIS") under the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa, et seq. ("SIPA"), filed his proposed Amended Complaint on August 30, 2017 ("PAC") 1 (ECF Doc.”
Picard v. Legacy Capital Ltd. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), 548 B.R. 13 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016). “Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (“SIPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa, et seq. The Amended Complaint seeks to avoid and recover approximately $213 million in initial transfers made to Legacy and approximately $6.”
In re Picard, 917 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2019). “On December 15, 2008, the Securities Investment Protection Corporation, acting pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1978 ("SIPA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa et seq. , petitioned the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for a protective…”
Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979). “1636 , *239 15 U. S. C. § 78aaa et seq., investors nevertheless had no private cause of action judicially to compel SIPC "to commit its funds or otherwise to act for the protection" of investors.”
Holmes v. Sec. Inv. Prot. Corp., 503 U.S. 258 (1992). “…II). We hold that it cannot. I A The Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA), 84 Stat. 1636 , as amended, 15 U. S. C. §§ 78aaa78 lll, authorized the formation of SIPC, a private nonprofit corporation, § 78ccc(a)(1), of which most broker-dealers registered under §…”
Picard v. Cohmad Sec. Corp. (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), 454 B.R. 317 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011). “15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. Hereinafter, "SIPA" shall replace "15 U.”
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 773 F.3d 411 (2d Cir. 2014). “Picard (the “Trustee”) was appointed trustee for BLMIS pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. (“SIPA”). Under SIPA, a trustee is empowered to “recover” (or claw back) money paid out by the debtor, as long as the money “would have been…”
Sec. Inv. Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC, 480 B.R. 501 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012). “15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. Hereinafter "SIPA” shall replace "15 U.”
Sec. Inv. Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC), 474 B.R. 76 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). “15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. References to sections of SIPA hereinafter replace “15 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.