16 U.S.C. § 1375
Penalties
1994—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–238, § 13(a), inserted “, except as provided in section 1387 of this title,” after “thereunder”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–238, § 13(b), inserted “(except as provided in section 1387 of this title)” after “thereunder”.
1981—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–58 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
Section effective upon the expiration of the sixty-day period following
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2024 · leading case: Pac. Ranger, LLC v. Pritzker, 211 F. Supp. 3d 196 (D.D.C. 2016).
Pac. Ranger, LLC v. Pritzker, 211 F. Supp. 3d 196 (D.D.C. 2016). “See 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (a)(1) (setting civil penalty cap and hearing requirement); see also 15 C.”
United States v. David Hayashi, 5 F.3d 1278 (9th Cir. 1993). “See 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (b). The government agrees that the only definition of “take” with possible application to.”
United States v. David Hayashi, 22 F.3d 859 (9th Cir. 1994). “See 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (b). The government agrees that the only definition of “take” with possible application to Hayashi is “to harass” or “attempt to harass.”
United States v. Jerry D. Mitchell, 553 F.2d 996 (5th Cir. 1977). “The violation of this regulation becomes a crime pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1375 , which states in part: (b) Any person who knowingly violates any provision of this subchapter or of any permit or regulation issued thereunder shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $20,-000…”
People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Miami Seaquarium, 189 F. Supp. 3d 1327 (S.D. Fla. 2016). “Like the ESA, the MMPA prescribes both civil and criminal penalties, see 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (b), is also administered by the NMFS, and advances a similar purpose: the prevention of the extinction or depletion of marine mammals.”
United States v. The J. B. Williams Co., Inc., & Parkson Advert. Agency, Inc., 498 F.2d 414 (2d Cir. 1974). “See also Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (a) ; Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.”
Atlas Roofing Co., Inc. v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, United States Dep't Oflabor, 518 F.2d 990 (5th Cir. 1975). “Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (1972 supp.). 7. Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.”
Mohawk Excavating, Inc. v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n & W. J. Usery, Jr., Sec'y of Labor, 549 F.2d 859 (2d Cir. 1977). “§ 1321 ,18 predecessors 18 See also Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (a); Occupational Safety and Health Act, 29 U.”
United States v. F/v Repulse, in Rem, & Arnie Kjarstad, Claimant-Appellant, 688 F.2d 1283 (9th Cir. 1982). “” Moreover, in the preceding section, 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (b), Congress provided for criminal penalties.”
Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. United States, 2018 CIT 100 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). “§ 1858 (a) (providing for civil penalties of up to $100,000 for each violation) with 16 U.S.C. § 1375 (providing up to $20,000 in civil penalties for each knowing violation of the MMPA).”
Katelnikoff v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 657 F. Supp. 659 (D. Alaska 1986). “Although the Act does provide for criminal proceedings or the assessment of civil penalties, 16 U.S.C. § 1375 , neither have been initiated; however, the seized items remain in the custody of the Fish & Wildlife service.”
Fouke Co. v. Mandel, 386 F. Supp. 1341 (D. Maryland 1974). “16 U.S.C. § 1375 . While this Court also does not reach that issue herein, it is apparent that if that penalty is a “penalty” within the meaning of 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.