16 U.S.C. § 1902
Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1988–1995 · leading case: United States v. Joseph E. Vogler v. N. Alaska Env't Ctr. Sierra Club, Alaska Chapter the Wilderness Soc'y, Plaintiff-Intervenors, 859 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1988).
United States v. Joseph E. Vogler v. N. Alaska Env't Ctr. Sierra Club, Alaska Chapter the Wilderness Soc'y, Plaintiff-Intervenors, 859 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1988). “16 U.S.C. § 1902 . Vogler is a placer miner who owns between 50 and 150 patented and unpatented mining claims within the Preserve.”
Hafen v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 470 (Fed. Cl. 1994). “Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1902 of the MPA, the Secretary of the Interior may promulgate regulations governing “activities resulting from the exercise of valid existing mineral rights of patented or unpatented mine claims____” Those regulations can be found in 26 C.”
Duncan Energy Co. v. United States Forest Serv., 50 F.3d 584 (8th Cir. 1995). “Duncan responds that Congress has not enacted and the Forest Service has not implemented by regulations the authority the Forest Service now attempts to invoke.”
N. Alaska Env't Ctr. v. Lujan, 872 F.2d 901 (9th Cir. 1989). “Ill Appellants claim that the Mining in the Parks Act (MPA), 16 U.S.C. § 1902 (1982) “contemplates that no mining will be approved unless the claim contains a valid discovery.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.